2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moisture monitoring in clay embankments using electrical resistivity tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Noninvasive geophysical methods, which are capable of estimating physical properties of significant volumes of the subsurface, are well-suited for this application (Donohue et al, 2011). Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) (Loke and Barker, 1996), for example, has, over recent years, been used for near-surface time-lapse imaging of natural slopes and landslides (e.g., Miller et al, 2008;Uhlenbrook et al, 2008;Cassiani et al, 2009) or, more relevant to the topic of the present work, monitoring the internal condition and temporal dynamics of geotechnical assets (e.g., Sjodahl et al, 2008, Wilkinson et al, 2011Chambers et al, 2014;Gunn et al, 2015a). Favored by the sensitivity of resistivity data to changing hydrogeological conditions, ERT, however, requires an additional stage of calibration, often site dependent, to invert for parameters more relevant to the mechanical description of the investigated target (e.g., moisture content, as in Cassiani et al, 2009;Chambers et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noninvasive geophysical methods, which are capable of estimating physical properties of significant volumes of the subsurface, are well-suited for this application (Donohue et al, 2011). Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) (Loke and Barker, 1996), for example, has, over recent years, been used for near-surface time-lapse imaging of natural slopes and landslides (e.g., Miller et al, 2008;Uhlenbrook et al, 2008;Cassiani et al, 2009) or, more relevant to the topic of the present work, monitoring the internal condition and temporal dynamics of geotechnical assets (e.g., Sjodahl et al, 2008, Wilkinson et al, 2011Chambers et al, 2014;Gunn et al, 2015a). Favored by the sensitivity of resistivity data to changing hydrogeological conditions, ERT, however, requires an additional stage of calibration, often site dependent, to invert for parameters more relevant to the mechanical description of the investigated target (e.g., moisture content, as in Cassiani et al, 2009;Chambers et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore crucial to develop efficient approaches for the assessment of earthwork stability, so that mitigation measures can be targeted and, consequently, failures can be avoided. Geophysical methods, when used as complementary tools together with traditional geotechnical investigations, are ideally suited for earthwork investigations (Donohue et al, 2011(Donohue et al, , 2012Chambers et al, 2014;Gunn et al, 2015a). In addition to being noninvasive, several techniques are cost effective and rapid, allowing detailed 2D and 3D volumetric information to be obtained, with repeated observations permitting temporal variations to be measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recognized body of research is emerging, focusing on the relationship among electrical resistivity, moisture content, and pore pressure (Chambers et al, 2014;Gunn et al, 2015a); however, to date, little work has been carried out using seismic geophysical methods to temporally and spatially monitor variations in the mechanical properties of slopes. S-wave (V S ) and P-wave (V P ) seismic velocities are related to the small-strain shear modulus G 0 and constrained modulus M 0 as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, while useful for ground truthing, the limited sampling of invasive site investigation (SI) methods makes them unsuitable for imaging irregular heterogeneous structures. Non-invasive geophysical techniques are cost-effective and rapid, and may provide twodimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) information, which makes them ideal for studying the spatial and temporal variations within assets that cannot be readily captured using discrete boreholes or other forms of geotechnical investigation alone (Bergamo et al, 2016;Chambers et al, 2014;Gunn et al, 2015aGunn et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Embankment Characterisation and Imaging Usingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical imaging approaches can monitor internal property (condition) changes. These are the precursors connecting surface morphological response to subsurface processes driven by climate and ageing stresses (Gunn et al, 2015a(Gunn et al, , 2016. These property change signatures offer a potential baseline against which internal condition thresholds can be identified and used as early warning of future instability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%