1995
DOI: 10.1007/s001070050118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moisture distribution changes during drying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 14 shows a dramatic change in the moisture content gradient between 9.2 and 10 hours. A similar observation to this has also been made by Cloutier et al (1992) and Wiberg (1995). This is partly explained by Spolek and Plumb (1981 pressure is no longer possible as a moisture transport process.…”
Section: Measurementssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 14 shows a dramatic change in the moisture content gradient between 9.2 and 10 hours. A similar observation to this has also been made by Cloutier et al (1992) and Wiberg (1995). This is partly explained by Spolek and Plumb (1981 pressure is no longer possible as a moisture transport process.…”
Section: Measurementssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This provides a suddenly increased resistance to moisture transport within the specimen that develops the steep moisture content gradient in Figure 14 between 9.2 and 10 hours. Wiberg (1995) concludes that the free water in sapwood migrate due to capillary forces towards the surface where bound water diffusion controls the drying rate.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The length of this part did not change at various sample lengths: approximately 2-3 mm from each sample surface, which is close to the length of the sample tracheid cell, approximately 3.5 mm (Yokoyama et al 2011). It suggests that the tracheid cells near the surface were firstly dried; such a phenomenon was also found in previous works (Wiberg 1995;Wiberg and More ´n 1999;Xu et al 2017) for the samples still with a high averaged MC. One of the most intriguing findings is that the subsurface areas tended to have higher MC than inside areas after drying for several hours (i.e., at 100 % and 60 % reference MC), especially inside longer wood samples.…”
Section: Visualizing the MC Changes In The Wood Samplessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…If this is done, the transport at the surface controls the internal moisture state of the plank. This phenomenon of drying without internal moisture gradients is especially noticed when drying sapwood of Scandinavian softwoods at high moisture levels (Wiberg 1995, 1997and Rosenkilde 1996. When modelling water in vapour phase, the diffusion coef®cient, D, is assumed to be a function of moisture content and temperature according to Fig.…”
Section: Moisture Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%