1985
DOI: 10.1271/bbb1961.49.1809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moisture diffusion within shredded tobacco leaves.

Abstract: The mechanismof moisture transfer into shredded tobacco was investigated in connection with moistening process control in cigarette manufacturing. For shredded tobaccos of less than about 1.0mmshred width, the moisture was sorbed mainly through the cut faces rather than through the leaf epidermis, indicating that the moisture diffusion within the leaf was the rate limiting step of moisture transfer. The moisture diffusion coefficient values within the cured tobacco leaf ranged from 8.80x 10~7 to 64.2x 10~7cm2-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consisted with Walton et al, who observed that D eff varied from 0.7×10 − 15 m 2 s − 1 to 5.2×10 − 14 m 2 s − 1 during the desorption and adsorption in the tobacco[14] Samejima and Yano (1985) [20]. reported that D eff in cured tobacco leaves ranged from 8.80×10 − 11 m 2 s − 1 to 64.2×10 − 11 m 2 s − 1 depending on the type of tobacco and on sorption temperature.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are consisted with Walton et al, who observed that D eff varied from 0.7×10 − 15 m 2 s − 1 to 5.2×10 − 14 m 2 s − 1 during the desorption and adsorption in the tobacco[14] Samejima and Yano (1985) [20]. reported that D eff in cured tobacco leaves ranged from 8.80×10 − 11 m 2 s − 1 to 64.2×10 − 11 m 2 s − 1 depending on the type of tobacco and on sorption temperature.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Samejima et al [20] reported that the difference in the moisture diffusion coefficient between air-cured and flue-cured tobacco reflects the difference in porosity. The simple correlation analysis results show that the effective diffusion coefficient was significantly influenced by specific pore volume.…”
Section: Effect Of Physicochemical Characteristics On Effective Moistmentioning
confidence: 99%