2006
DOI: 10.1002/app.25219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moisture absorption modeling using design of experiments

Abstract: The effect of temperature and humidity on equilibrium moisture content of laminates was studied by response surface design. Two glass fabric-reinforced laminated composite materials with different epoxy matrix resins, laminates A and B, were studied. Laminates A and B used are cyanate ester and polyphenylene oxide modified epoxy based laminate, respectively. The results show that the response surface profiles of moisture absorption for the two laminate materials are similar though their amounts of moisture abs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 2B and 2C show the weight loss of all samples, indicating the rst decomposition stage below 100 °C. This loss might have been due to moisture elimination (29,30). The blank solvent-cast polymeric lms showed two stages of weight loss: (I) in the 139-226°C temperature range, with maximum temperature at 184.23°C, 197.01°C, and 191.68°C, and (II) in the 221-327°C temperature range, with maximum temperature at 254.06°C, 245.98°C, and 236.03°C for the FB01, FB02, and FB03 formulations, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 2B and 2C show the weight loss of all samples, indicating the rst decomposition stage below 100 °C. This loss might have been due to moisture elimination (29,30). The blank solvent-cast polymeric lms showed two stages of weight loss: (I) in the 139-226°C temperature range, with maximum temperature at 184.23°C, 197.01°C, and 191.68°C, and (II) in the 221-327°C temperature range, with maximum temperature at 254.06°C, 245.98°C, and 236.03°C for the FB01, FB02, and FB03 formulations, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%