2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30006.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moist Exposed Therapy: An Effective and Valid Alternative to Occlusive Dressings for Postlaser Resurfacing Wound Care

Abstract: Moist exposed burn ointment application can be safely considered a good and valid alternative to occlusive dressings for postoperative laser care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So the gauze impregnated with Vaseline is applicated to this dressing. This can keep the wound in the moisturized environment (14, 15). After covering with Vaseline gauze, we enclosed the wound with 5-6 layers of wet gauze.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the gauze impregnated with Vaseline is applicated to this dressing. This can keep the wound in the moisturized environment (14, 15). After covering with Vaseline gauze, we enclosed the wound with 5-6 layers of wet gauze.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have intended to accelerate re‐epithelialization, with decreased downtime and minimized irritation. However, optimal results were from AFL treatment, including the settings of proper laser treatment parameters, applying ice‐cold wet compresses, gentle skin cleansing, and repeated applying of moisturizer for constant skin moisture to promote cell migration and thereby re‐epithelialization, and prevent cell death until crusting ceases, occlusive dressing, and photoprotection, using broad‐spectrum sunscreen with anti‐inflammatory agents …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HydroTac provides a continuum of hydration that aids wound healing.  Faster wound healing (Winter, 1962;Dyson et al, 1988;Beam et al, 2008)  Promote epithelialisation rate (Winter, 1962;Eaglstein, 2001;Ågren et al, 2001;Varghese et al, 1986;Rubio, 1991;Madden et al, 1989;Wigger-Alberti et al, 2009)  Promote dermal/wound bed healing responses, e.g., cell proliferation, ECM synthesis (Svensjö et al, 2000;Dyson et al, 1992;Mosti, 2013;Korting et al, 2010;Chen et al, 1992;Leung et al, 2010;Field & Kerstein, 1994;Dowsett & Ayello, 2004;Katz et al, 1991)  ReducI can't es scarring (Atiyeh et al, 2003(Atiyeh et al, ,2004O'Shaughnessy et al, 2009;Mustoe & Gurjala, 2011;Tandara et al, 2007;Hoeksema et al, 2013)  Retention of growth factors at wound site (Svensjö et al, 2000;Hackl et al, 2014;Powers et al, 2013;Chen et al, 1992;Attinger et al, 2006;Vogt et al, 1995)  Lower wound infection rates (Kannon & Garret, 1995;Hutchinson & Lawrence, 1991;Lawrence, 1994)  Reduces pain perception (Wiechula, 2003;Metzger, 2004;Leaper et al, 2012;Coutts et al, 2008;Feldman, 1991;...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%