2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29347.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mohs Tissue Mapping and Processing: A Survey Study

Abstract: There is variability in mapping and processing techniques employed Mohs micrographic surgeons and their histotechnicians. As long as the integrity of each step of Mohs tissue mapping and processing is preserved, the high cure rate of the technique should be maintained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey of Mohs surgeons published in 2003 showed a great variety of the devices and techniques used to flatten, to freeze, and to prepare the tissues in Mohs surgery, among them, the heat extractor flattening in the cryostat (22.6%), relaxing incisions (16.1%), heat extractor and relaxing incisions (14.2%), freezing on a glass slide (10.3%), relaxing incision and glass slide (9.4%), and the Miami Special technique (3.9%) are the most commonly used 10 . Other less used devices, such as the Davidson Cryocup TM (Bradley Products Inc., Bloomington, MN), CryoHist TM (Cryo Histology, Inc., Shawnee, KS), the Cryo-Embedder TM ( Salt Lake City, UT), the face-down cryoembedding of tissue using stainless stell embedding wells, and the use of dry ice have been described to optimize the tissue preparation process 8,9,11,12 .…”
Section: Many Innovative Techniques Have Been Developed To Improvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of Mohs surgeons published in 2003 showed a great variety of the devices and techniques used to flatten, to freeze, and to prepare the tissues in Mohs surgery, among them, the heat extractor flattening in the cryostat (22.6%), relaxing incisions (16.1%), heat extractor and relaxing incisions (14.2%), freezing on a glass slide (10.3%), relaxing incision and glass slide (9.4%), and the Miami Special technique (3.9%) are the most commonly used 10 . Other less used devices, such as the Davidson Cryocup TM (Bradley Products Inc., Bloomington, MN), CryoHist TM (Cryo Histology, Inc., Shawnee, KS), the Cryo-Embedder TM ( Salt Lake City, UT), the face-down cryoembedding of tissue using stainless stell embedding wells, and the use of dry ice have been described to optimize the tissue preparation process 8,9,11,12 .…”
Section: Many Innovative Techniques Have Been Developed To Improvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large proportion of surgeons use relaxing incisions. 18,19 In HT dialect, the incisions will also "line up" the leading edge of the epidermis for better sectioning. This is analogous to cutting a box to flatten it, conforms 3 dimensions to 2, and gives your HT less work (Fig.…”
Section: The Preparation Of Frozen Sections For Skin Cancer Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods and devices have been designed to facilitate these key steps of tissue processing in MMS. Some of these methods are: manual (direct) technique, microscope slide technique, Bard-Parker scalpel, freezing bar technique, plastic "Cryomolds", "Davidson Cryocup" metal molds, Carter's device, Koehn's modification of Carter's device, "Miami Special" clamps, Gormley's device, Motley & Holt's device, Marini's "CryoSystem", Franks' device, and "CryoHist" [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Some inaccuracies of tissue processing are unavoidable and depend on the unique features of a particular device or technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%