2008
DOI: 10.1080/11035890801303113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moho depth variation in the Baltic Shield from analysis of converted waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more realistic cases, however, the methodology has significant problems, showing multiple local maxima (e.g. Eaton et al 2006;Olsson et al 2008). In addition, the results depend on the validity of the chosen range of H and k values since this choice influences the resulting global maximum: a maximum outside of an overly restrictive grid will be excluded while a very liberal grid may include a number of non-physical maxima.…”
Section: Discussion a N D C O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more realistic cases, however, the methodology has significant problems, showing multiple local maxima (e.g. Eaton et al 2006;Olsson et al 2008). In addition, the results depend on the validity of the chosen range of H and k values since this choice influences the resulting global maximum: a maximum outside of an overly restrictive grid will be excluded while a very liberal grid may include a number of non-physical maxima.…”
Section: Discussion a N D C O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crustal velocity and thickness are mainly determined by seismic refraction experiments and by analyses of receiver functions (EUGENO-S Working Group 1988; Iwasaki et al 1994;Svenningsen et al 2007;Olsson et al 2008;Sandrin & Thybo 2008;Stratford et al 2009;Stratford & Thybo 2011;. For a recent compilation and analysis, see Artemieva & Thybo (2013).…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%