Mohammed

Nagel, Tilman

doi:10.1524/9783486780956

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Experimental Work1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2009

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Book4

Article1

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 14 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Jennifer Nagel, on the other hand, takes the intuitions to not support IRI over classical invariantism (where knowledge is not sensitive to stakes). 19 And Patrick Rysiew thinks these reactions reflect pragmatic features of the conversational context and consistent with invariantism. 20 Despite the differences, many are in agreement about the data.…”

Section: Experimental Workmentioning

confidence: 78%

Some Recent Work in Experimental Epistemology

Pinillos

2011

Philosophy Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I survey here some recent work on experimental philosophy and its bearing on some current debates in Epistemology. In the first part of the paper, I survey some general methodological issues concerning the relevance of folk judgments (a domain of study of experimental philosophy) to Contextualism and Interest Relative Invariantism (IRI). In the second part, I provide a critical review of several experiments some of which have been thought to disfavor contextualism and IRI, and others which have been thought to favor contrastivism (a type of contextualism).

show abstract

Section: Experimental Workmentioning

confidence: 78%