2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOF-5 composites exhibiting improved thermal conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
117
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
10
117
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A molecular simulation study was conducted by Zhang et al [27] to calculate the thermal conductivity of zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8). It was reported that the thermal conductivity varies from 0.165 to 0.190 W (m K) −1 in the temperature range of 300 to 1000 K. The thermal conductivity has been experimentally measured for MOF-5 [28] and found to be only 0.1 W (m K) −1 at room temperature. The low thermal conductivity was enhanced through the use of the thermally conductive Expanded Natural Graphite (ENG); the addition of 10 wt % ENG resulted in a five folds enhancement in the thermal conductivity relative to neat MOF-5, increasing it from 0.10 to 0.56 W (m K) −1 .…”
Section: Kumar Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A molecular simulation study was conducted by Zhang et al [27] to calculate the thermal conductivity of zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8). It was reported that the thermal conductivity varies from 0.165 to 0.190 W (m K) −1 in the temperature range of 300 to 1000 K. The thermal conductivity has been experimentally measured for MOF-5 [28] and found to be only 0.1 W (m K) −1 at room temperature. The low thermal conductivity was enhanced through the use of the thermally conductive Expanded Natural Graphite (ENG); the addition of 10 wt % ENG resulted in a five folds enhancement in the thermal conductivity relative to neat MOF-5, increasing it from 0.10 to 0.56 W (m K) −1 .…”
Section: Kumar Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, adding binders also reduces the percentage of MOF in a shaped structure on a mass basis. The shaped structure must prevent external diffusion limitation, facilitate mass transport, and also possess good mechanical strength to resist abrasion [12]. To date, very few studies are systematic in determining the effect of binders on physical properties (surface area, pore volume, hardness) of the resulting composites and relating these properties to hydrogen storage performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective thermal conductivity of MOF-5 powders is less than the single-crystal value because of their large pore sizes and high free volumes. Purewal et al [6,7] adopted two representative ways to increase the effective thermal conductivity of MOF-5 powders in a storage tank. The first method is powder densification, which can yield a 350% increase in volumetric H2 density compared with powders with a density of 0.5 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity of the MOF-5 powder bed will decrease with an increase in pressure, as shown in Figure 1b. In this work, the following assumptions are made: the pore in the crystal does not experience the collapse phenomenon at the study pressure range (0.01-50 MPa), and the relation between density and pressure is linear [7]. This relationship is expressed as …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%