2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0129167x16500038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulus of continuity of solutions to complex Hessian equations

Abstract: We give a sharp estimate of the modulus of continuity of the solution to the Dirichlet problem for the complex Hessian equation of order m (1 ≤ m ≤ n) with a continuous right hand side and a continuous boundary data in a bounded strongly m-pseudoconvex domain Ω ⋐ C n . Moreover when the right hand side is in L p (Ω), for some p > n/m and the boundary value function is C 1,1 we prove that the solution is Hölder continuous.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When f ∈ L p (Ω) for p ≥ 2, we are able to find a Hölder continuous barrier to the Dirichlet problem with more better Hölder exponent. The following theorem was proved in [Ch14] for the complex Hessian equation and it is enough here to put m = n for the complex Monge-Ampère equation. We note that…”
Section: Hölder Continuous Solutions For the Dirichlet Problem With Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When f ∈ L p (Ω) for p ≥ 2, we are able to find a Hölder continuous barrier to the Dirichlet problem with more better Hölder exponent. The following theorem was proved in [Ch14] for the complex Hessian equation and it is enough here to put m = n for the complex Monge-Ampère equation. We note that…”
Section: Hölder Continuous Solutions For the Dirichlet Problem With Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first part of this corollary was proved in Theorem 1.2 in [BKPZ15] with the Hölder exponent min{2γ, α}γ and the second part was proved in [GKZ08] and [Ch15] (see also [N14,Ch14] for the complex Hessian equation).…”
Section: Corollary 35mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To this end, we need to construct two functions v and w satifying the requirement of the Lemma 2.4. Let w be the maximal m-subharmonic function on Ω with boundary values g. By [Ch16b], we have κ w (δ) ≤ κ g ( √ δ) and by the comparison principle we have u ≤ w on Ω.…”
Section: An Easy Computation Shows Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%