1965
DOI: 10.1007/bf01220018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modules which are isomorphic to submodules of each other

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While existence of minimal cotilting modules is a non-trivial fact, their uniqueness up to isomorphism follows easily from their pure-injectivity [13] and from a classic result of Bumby [6]; it does not require the noetherian or commutative assumption on R: Lemma 2.3. Let R be an arbitrary ring.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While existence of minimal cotilting modules is a non-trivial fact, their uniqueness up to isomorphism follows easily from their pure-injectivity [13] and from a classic result of Bumby [6]; it does not require the noetherian or commutative assumption on R: Lemma 2.3. Let R be an arbitrary ring.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bumby's theorem [3]. Moreover, we shall see in Proposition 4.1 that ker f and ker g have the same monogeny class if and only if the cyclically presented modules corresponding to ker f and ker g via an exact contravariant functor have the same epigeny class, and ker f and ker g have the same upper part if and only if the modules corresponding to ker f and ker g via the same contravariant functor have the same lower part in the sense of [2].…”
Section: So That E(e(a)/a) ∼ = E(e(b)/b) Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since M and N are isomorphic to a direct summand of the other, the same happens for F E (M) and F E (N). By [3],…”
Section: (A) If E Is An Idempotent Endomorphism Of E With Image M Andmentioning
confidence: 99%