2012
DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2011.602273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modules and Spectral Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. Since R is Noetherian, U is quasi-compact by [2,Proposition 3.24]. Thus there exist n ∈ , open subsets W 1 W n of U , t 1 t n ∈ R, l 1 l n ∈ N such that U = n j=1 W j and for each j = 1 n and P ∈ W j we have t j = P M and = l j /t j .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof. Since R is Noetherian, U is quasi-compact by [2,Proposition 3.24]. Thus there exist n ∈ , open subsets W 1 W n of U , t 1 t n ∈ R, l 1 l n ∈ N such that U = n j=1 W j and for each j = 1 n and P ∈ W j we have t j = P M and = l j /t j .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In 1986, McCasland and Moore adjusted the definition to the M -radical given in [24, p. 37]. Thus, began the extensive study of radical theory for modules, which has continued with the more recent work of many algebraists [1,16,21,23,25,30]. In work beginning in the nineties, many authors have studied analogs of Krulls principal ideal theorem or/and developed a dimension theory for modules [7,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the length of any saturated chain of the prime submodules of M starting from P and ending at Q is equal to rank R/p (Q/P ). Afterward, an extensive study of radical theory for modules was begun, which has continued with the more recent work [1,16,20,22,24,28,31]. Many algebraists (for example see [10], [20] and [30]) tried to find a relationship between rad(N ) and √ (N : M ), where N is a submodule of an R-module M .…”
Section: Theorem 32 Let {M λ } λ∈λ Be a Collection Of Distinct Maximal Ideals Of R And M λ Be An Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], some conditions have been obtained under which rad(N ) = √ (N : M )M , for each submodule N of M . Finding an explicit formula for the radical of submodule is an interesting subject of many papers (see [1,10,19,28]). In the sequel we introduced some expressions for the radical of special submodules of certain modules.…”
Section: Theorem 32 Let {M λ } λ∈λ Be a Collection Of Distinct Maximal Ideals Of R And M λ Be An Mmentioning
confidence: 99%