2014
DOI: 10.1179/1743132814y.0000000395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Module modified acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II: predicting the mortality of neuro-critical disease

Abstract: The APACHE II severity of disease classification system cannot provide accurate prognosis for all kinds of the diseases. A MM-APACHE II model can accurately predict hospital mortality for cerebral infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and neurologic infection patients in N-ICU.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the performance of mortality prediction, the APACHE II scale has been validated and accepted in many settings of general ICU, with the AUC varying from 0.74 to 0.86 ( 17 - 21 ). The risk-adjusted formula to predict mortality estimated from APACHE II score is a remarkable advantage ( 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the performance of mortality prediction, the APACHE II scale has been validated and accepted in many settings of general ICU, with the AUC varying from 0.74 to 0.86 ( 17 - 21 ). The risk-adjusted formula to predict mortality estimated from APACHE II score is a remarkable advantage ( 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the critical appraisal process, few articles reviewed the value of APACHE II score and performance of mortality prediction in subspecialty ICUs that have different case-mix and different provider-mix such as neurosurgical ICU ( 3 ). The discordance between the predictive implications, particularly on some specific neurosurgical disease conditions that were not generalized to the others, was mentioned ( 17 ). Therefore, this retrospective study was performed to present the severity of illness by acknowledging the APACHE II score among neurosurgical ICU patients, to predict mortality reflecting APACHE II performance, and to evaluate the relationship of APACHE II score parameters as if they could estimate the length of hospital stay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of ROC modeling has applications across diagnoses. As mentioned above, these techniques have been used to classify patients with spinal muscular atrophy based on electrical impedance myography, muscle ultrasound, and biomarker analyses; to predict mortality in a neurointensive care unit in patients with cerebral infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and neurological infection; and to quantify fracture risk in chronic kidney disease . Although the methods are the same, we would expect results to differ across disease conditions due to individual disease characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When attempting to understand or predict loss in function, it is important to understand all factors that influence task performance. Statistical modeling techniques of machine learning utilizing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves have been used in different diseases to identify variables that differentiate between groups or predict outcomes . Most recently, this technique has been utilized in spinal muscular atrophy to identify and validate biomarkers associated with disease severity .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to attenuate this pitfal l; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) have been initiated. These scales can clinical ly simplify and categorize critical ly ill patient with its high mortality pre-dictive ability as shown in the area under the receiver operat ing characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76-0.90 [9,10] for general ICU and 0.81-0.89 [11][12][13] together with sensitivity/ specifi city over 74% [14] for neurosurgical ICU. However, the diff erences of scale prediction have not been established, especial ly in neurosurgical patients lately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%