2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2011.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation spaces, Wiener amalgam spaces, and Brownian motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would like to stress again, however, that our reason for considering the randomization of the form (1.9) comes from its connection to time-frequency analysis. See also our previous papers [3] and [4].…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to stress again, however, that our reason for considering the randomization of the form (1.9) comes from its connection to time-frequency analysis. See also our previous papers [3] and [4].…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After posting this paper on ArXiv,Árpád Bényi and Tadahiro Oh kindly pointed out that there is some overlap with their paper [1], in which similar techniques are used to characterize the exponents (s, p, q) for which a Brownian motion on T is in B s p,q (T) and inb s p,q (T). In fact, in dimension d = 1 some (but not all) of our results could alternatively be deduced from theirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stochastic convolution, when measured in terms of its interaction representation S(−t)Ψ(t), then gains one temporal regularity and thus has temporal regularity b < 1 − 1 q . This is precisely the regularity of the Brownian motion measured in the Fourier-Lebesgue spaces; see [3]. The next lemma tells us the regularity of the stochastic convolution with respect to the X s,b p,q -spaces.…”
Section: On the Stochastic Convolutionmentioning
confidence: 91%