2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)00798-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of the neuronal circuitry subserving working memory in healthy human subjects by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
85
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The first group of relevant studies [18][19][20][21][22] aimed to verify the hypothesis that the DLPFC plays a crucial role in WM by using the TMS technique. All the studies agree in finding that the DLPFC is involved in the performance of WM tasks, in particular those tasks in which the manipulation of information is required.…”
Section: Wm and Tmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first group of relevant studies [18][19][20][21][22] aimed to verify the hypothesis that the DLPFC plays a crucial role in WM by using the TMS technique. All the studies agree in finding that the DLPFC is involved in the performance of WM tasks, in particular those tasks in which the manipulation of information is required.…”
Section: Wm and Tmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Mottaghy and others [20][21][22] investigated the chronometry of the DLPFC involvement in WM and reported how TMS really interferes with the WM task if applied later than 180 ms after the stimulus onset. in fact, they found that the processing of information in WM follows a flow from posterior to anterior regions, and from right to left hemisphere within the PFC [20] .…”
Section: Wm and Tmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, rTMS was not expected to suppress the function of the targeted brain region, but rather to modulate its activity to a certain degree, by approximately 15 or 20% if consistent with the findings of similar protocols on cortico-spinal excitability Maeda, Keenan, Tormos, Topka, & Pascual-Leone, 2000a;Romero, Anschel, Sparing, Gangitano, & PREMOTOR ACTIVITY AFTER rTMS 299 Pascual- . In this sense rTMS effects on PFC can be conceived as the result of the ''dynamic'' modulation of multiple afferences and efferences in a complex neuronal network (Mottaghy et al, 2000). …”
Section: Interaction Between Prefrontal and Premotor Corticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the suppression of cortico-spinal excitability following low-rate rTMS of the motor cortex in Experiment 3 is consistent with other observations (Chen et al, 1997;Hallett, 2000;Maeda, Keenan, Tormos, Topka, & PascualLeone, 2000b;Pascual-Leone et al, 1999Rothwell, 1991;Walsh & Cowey, 2000) the lack of similar effects in Experiment 2 (when the rTMS was applied to the PMC) is surprising in light of findings that have shown the presence of a robust decrease of cortico-spinal excitability after 1 Hz rTMS to the PMC (Gerschlager, Siebner, & Rothwell, 2001) when intensities of 90% of motor threshold has been employed (Rizzo et al, 2003). Other studies employing low intensities of stimulation (80% MT) on the same premotor spot have shown small or no modulatory effects on MEP amplitude (Mü nchau, Bloem, Trimble, & Rothwell, 2002). It is possible that in our study the relatively short duration of the rTMS train may not have been sufficient to induce a more robust modulation of cortico-spinal excitability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Motthaghy and colleagues, for example, tested the effect of rTMS on a working memory task and on regional blood flow changes [114]. Repetitive TMS was applied in 30 s trains at a frequency of 4 Hz over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFC) and over the midline frontal cortex as a control site.…”
Section: Tms-pet and Tms-spect Coregistrationmentioning
confidence: 99%