2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of the maternal immune system by the pre-implantation embryo

Abstract: BackgroundA large proportion of pregnancy losses occur during the pre-implantation period, when the developing embryo is elongating rapidly and signalling its presence to the maternal system. The molecular mechanisms that prevent luteolysis and support embryo survival within the maternal environment are not well understood. To gain a more complete picture of these molecular events, genome-wide transcriptional profiles of reproductive day 17 endometrial tissue were determined in pregnant and cyclic Holstein-Fri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
135
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
13
135
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the transcriptomic alterations that occur in the endometrium as time from estrous to the luteal phase progresses, occur in a similar manner irrespective of whether an embryo/conceptus is present. In addition, the majority of these genes are also involved in the classical Type I IFN response and are comparable to those identified by Walker et al [33] on Day 17 of pregnancy. Comparison of these DEGs with previous studies during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy revealed that 27 are differentially expressed on Day 16 as part of the early endometrial response to the conceptus (aconitase 2, mitochondrial; ACO2, beta-2-microglobulin; B2M, XIAP associated factor 1; BIRC4BP, C4A, C14orf10, CD81, C1R, CLDN4, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E; EIF4E, epithelial stromal interaction 1 (breast); EPSTI1, interferon, alphainducible protein 6; IFI6, GABA(A) receptor-associated protein like 1; GABARAPL1, ISG15, interferon regulatory factor 9; IRF9, RNA helicase LGP2; LGP2, LGALS9, LGALS3BP, MX2, MX1, OAS1, proteasome (prosome, macropain) inhibitor subunit 1 (PI31); PSMF1, receptor (chemosensory) transporter protein 4; RTP4, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1, 91kDa; STAT1, SCOTIN, UBE1L and tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase; WARS [32]) and may represent early endometrial markers of a viable pre-implantation conceptus.…”
Section: Pregnancy Changessupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that the transcriptomic alterations that occur in the endometrium as time from estrous to the luteal phase progresses, occur in a similar manner irrespective of whether an embryo/conceptus is present. In addition, the majority of these genes are also involved in the classical Type I IFN response and are comparable to those identified by Walker et al [33] on Day 17 of pregnancy. Comparison of these DEGs with previous studies during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy revealed that 27 are differentially expressed on Day 16 as part of the early endometrial response to the conceptus (aconitase 2, mitochondrial; ACO2, beta-2-microglobulin; B2M, XIAP associated factor 1; BIRC4BP, C4A, C14orf10, CD81, C1R, CLDN4, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E; EIF4E, epithelial stromal interaction 1 (breast); EPSTI1, interferon, alphainducible protein 6; IFI6, GABA(A) receptor-associated protein like 1; GABARAPL1, ISG15, interferon regulatory factor 9; IRF9, RNA helicase LGP2; LGP2, LGALS9, LGALS3BP, MX2, MX1, OAS1, proteasome (prosome, macropain) inhibitor subunit 1 (PI31); PSMF1, receptor (chemosensory) transporter protein 4; RTP4, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1, 91kDa; STAT1, SCOTIN, UBE1L and tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase; WARS [32]) and may represent early endometrial markers of a viable pre-implantation conceptus.…”
Section: Pregnancy Changessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…prior to pregnancy recognition [12,13]. The fact that little detectable differences can be determined between pregnant and cyclic endometria prior to Day 15 [33,34], means that alterations to cyclic endometria associated with different models of pregnancy outcome, can be exploited. One of the key factors that can modulate these temporal changes is circulating concentrations of progesterone.…”
Section: Cycle Related Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, SOCS1 and SOCS3 transcript levels rose specifically at the time of implantation. This regulation of endometrial SOCS mRNA expression by the conceptus is consistent with microarray studies that listed several differentially expressed SOCS genes in the bovine pregnant endometrium compared with cyclic tissue collected at day 17 (SOCS1, Walker et al 2010), day 18 (SOCS1, SOCS3, SOCS4, SOCS6, Bauersachs et al 2012) and day 20 (SOCS6, Mansouri-Attia et al 2009a) after oestrus. Interestingly, the expression patterns of CISH, SOCS1, SOCS2 and SOCS3 mRNA reported in this study are similar to the changes observed in the ovine endometrium (Sandra et al 2005).…”
Section: Luminal Epitheliumsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…ICAR areas contain endometrial glands whose presence is critical for conceptus elongation (Gray et al 2001(Gray et al , 2002. Recent high-throughput data have highlighted specific molecular pathways and genes that account for the biological functions related with each endometrial area (Mansouri-Attia et al 2009a, Walker et al 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, WARS mRNA expression increases 2.4-fold in the endometrium of pregnant cows on day 17 compared with the matching stage of the oestrous cycle (Walker et al 2010). Up-regulation of WARS protein expression observed in sheep endometrium at conceptus implantation had not been reported previously.…”
Section: Protein Synthesis and Degradationmentioning
confidence: 66%