2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53839-0.00018-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of the brain’s functional network architecture in the transition from wake to sleep

Abstract: The transition from quiet wakeful rest to sleep represents a period over which attention to the external environment fades. Neuroimaging methodologies have provided much information on the shift in neural activity patterns in sleep, but the dynamic restructuring of human brain networks in the transitional period from wake to sleep remains poorly understood. Analysis of electrophysiological measures and functional network connectivity of these early transitional states shows subtle shifts in network architectur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
87
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
16
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, similarities between the awake and sleeping connectomes cannot be assumed to infer equivalence. In adult sleep staging studies, despite overall similarities, state-related differences between wakefulness and non-REM sleep are consistently observed (e.g., Boly et al, 2012; Horovitz et al, 2009; Larson-Prior et al, 2011; Spoormaker et al, 2012). These findings parallel the sleep-related cortical ‘breakdown’ described in the EEG literature: as sleep deepens, cortical intrinsic functional connectivity decreases (Massimini et al, 2005).…”
Section: Section 3: New Windows Into the Developing Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, similarities between the awake and sleeping connectomes cannot be assumed to infer equivalence. In adult sleep staging studies, despite overall similarities, state-related differences between wakefulness and non-REM sleep are consistently observed (e.g., Boly et al, 2012; Horovitz et al, 2009; Larson-Prior et al, 2011; Spoormaker et al, 2012). These findings parallel the sleep-related cortical ‘breakdown’ described in the EEG literature: as sleep deepens, cortical intrinsic functional connectivity decreases (Massimini et al, 2005).…”
Section: Section 3: New Windows Into the Developing Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concern is lessened by several findings across states of consciousness and animal models. First, in humans, the low-frequency correlation structure is similar at rest and in the early stages of sleep (Horovitz et al, 2009; Larson-Prior et al, 2011). Second, organized low-frequency fluctuations in fMRI signal are also found in awake and anesthetized macaques (Hutchison et al, 2011; Moeller et al, 2009; Vincent et al, 2007), marmosets (Liu et al, 2013), rats (Hutchison et al, 2010; Liang et al, 2011), mice (Jonckers et al, 2013; Jonckers et al, 2011; Sforazzini et al, 2014), and awake pigeons (De Groof et al, 2013).…”
Section: Measuring Brain Relationships Via Spontaneous Bold Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular issue to pay attention to is that patients may show different DMN activity from control groups 28,45,46,4750 in terms of coherence, spatial extent, relative magnitude of ICNs due to diverse factors that are epiphenomena of the illness under consideration related to treatment, lifestyle, demographic, and cognitive features 51,52 . Some of these specifics include medication, sleep 53,54 (one reason to acquire resting state data with the subjects eyes open, is to maximize the chance that subjects are awake during data-gathering acquisition, with consequently stronger temporal BOLD signal 35 . Physiological variables such as breathing and cardiac rate 55,56 can affect data, – for example a shared blood supply between different brain regions may falsely suggest shared variance in resting state FC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%