1986
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90061-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of the brain aversive system by GABAergic and serotonergic mechanisms

Abstract: Experiments performed in our laboratory, using electrical stimulation combined with microinjection of drugs in the dorsal midbrain central grey (CG) of the rat, evidenced that direct stimulation of GABA receptors with locally administered gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) or the GABAA receptor agonists 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol, isoguvacine and muscimol raised the aversive threshold, defined as the lowest electrical current intensity inducing flight or escape behaviour when applied to the dor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
31
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on evidence for a role of 5-HT in the processing of aversive signals, as well as models of depression as an oversensitivity to negative feedback (Elliott et al, 1997;Steffens et al, 2001;Murphy et al, 2003;Graeff et al, 1986;Smith and Kennedy, 2003), we hypothesize that the increased BOLD signal in the dorsomedial PFC reflects enhanced processing of aversive signals (error feedback) leading to enhanced response conflict on both switch and nonswitch trials. Clearly, the task does not fully dissociate negative feedback, conflict and behavioral switching: negative feedback initiates conflict and subsequent reversal, and a probabilistic task places demands on inhibitory control to maintain responding after misleading feedback.…”
Section: -Ht Modulation Of Reversal Learning Eat Evers Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on evidence for a role of 5-HT in the processing of aversive signals, as well as models of depression as an oversensitivity to negative feedback (Elliott et al, 1997;Steffens et al, 2001;Murphy et al, 2003;Graeff et al, 1986;Smith and Kennedy, 2003), we hypothesize that the increased BOLD signal in the dorsomedial PFC reflects enhanced processing of aversive signals (error feedback) leading to enhanced response conflict on both switch and nonswitch trials. Clearly, the task does not fully dissociate negative feedback, conflict and behavioral switching: negative feedback initiates conflict and subsequent reversal, and a probabilistic task places demands on inhibitory control to maintain responding after misleading feedback.…”
Section: -Ht Modulation Of Reversal Learning Eat Evers Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serotonin (5-HT) has been extensively implicated in depressed mood and the processing of motivational signals (Graeff et al, 1986;Soubrie, 1986;Deakin, 1991;Wilkinson et al, 1995). Animal research has demonstrated that 5-HTenhancing drugs attenuate the aversive effects of brain stimulation (Patkina and Lapin, 1976;Graeff et al, 1986;Smith and Kennedy, 2003), and, conversely, potentiate selfstimulation in so-called 'reward' centers and enhance the motivational properties of stimuli predictive of rewards (Redgrave and Horrell, 1976;Aronson et al, 1995;SasakiAdams and Kelley, 2001;Orosco et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) has long been implicated in the pathophysiology of mood and anxiety disorders, and in the processing of affective stimuli (Deakin, 1991;Graeff et al, 1986). More specifically, central 5-HT has long been thought to have a critical role in the adaptation of the animals to aversive events (Deakin and Graeff, 1991) and, recently, to mediate a negative prediction error signal for future threat and punishment (Cools et al, 2008a;Daw et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serotonin (5-HT) has been extensively implicated in depressed mood and is well known to affect the motivational properties of stimuli predictive of rewards (Fletcher et al, 1999;Sasaki-Adams and Kelley, 2001;Deakin, 1983;Wilkinson et al, 1995;Graeff et al, 1986), probably through interaction with the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system (Robbins et al, 1989;Robbins and Everitt, 2002). Treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) dose dependently decreases brain self-stimulation thresholds (Harrison and Markou, 2001), while the reinforcing effects of cocaine, cocaine-associated stimuli, and other stimuli predictive of rewards are potentiated by SSRI treatment and, conversely, attenuated by central 5-HT depletion (Aronson et al, 1995;Sasaki-Adams and Kelley, 2001;Redgrave and Horrell, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%