2015
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00031.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of motor unit activity in biceps brachii by neuromuscular electrical stimulation applied to the contralateral arm

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to determine the influence of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) current intensity and pulse width applied to the right elbow flexors on the discharge characteristics of motor units in the left biceps brachii. Three NMES current intensities were applied for 5 s with either narrow (0.2 ms) or wide (1 ms) stimulus pulses: one at 80% of motor threshold and two that evoked contractions at either ∼10% or ∼20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force. The discharge times of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main result of our study is the acute effect of the specific activation of peripheral sensory pathways on motor unit activity. This is in line with previous studies showing that the stimulation of the biceps brachii acutely impacts motor unit activity of the same muscle on the contralateral side (15, 18), though our stimulation parameters (i.e., pulse width and frequency) were slightly different. The changes in motor unit activity are likely due to the generation of excitatory post-synaptic potentials at the spinal level, through several potential neural pathways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main result of our study is the acute effect of the specific activation of peripheral sensory pathways on motor unit activity. This is in line with previous studies showing that the stimulation of the biceps brachii acutely impacts motor unit activity of the same muscle on the contralateral side (15, 18), though our stimulation parameters (i.e., pulse width and frequency) were slightly different. The changes in motor unit activity are likely due to the generation of excitatory post-synaptic potentials at the spinal level, through several potential neural pathways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Other studies have found that supplemented sensory feedback could also improve motor functions in patients with multiple sclerosis (16) or stroke (17). It is noteworthy that the effect of supplemented sensory feedback on motor unit firing activity was not uniform (18), likely due to non-homogeneous distribution of afferent inputs to motor neurons from the same pool (19) and a size effect of afferent inputs onto motor neuron firing activity (20). Whether this divergent modulation of motor neuron firing activity within the same pool impacts the motor unit firing activity, and as a consequence, the modulation of force remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Amiridis et al . ), regenerative and degenerative responses to muscle injury (Song et al . ), and changes in mechanomyography after exercise (McKay et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unilateral models of denervation are widely used for studies investigating the pathophysiology of muscle atrophy. However, there is a growing evidence for crossover effects of exercise, electrical stimulation, inflammation and injury in contralateral muscle 14,35,36 . Although many previous studies have shown denervation‐induced alterations in proteostatic properties, most of them were using contralateral‐innervated muscle of a mouse with a nerve transection as experimental control 37,38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%