2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.193407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of charge-density waves by superlattice structures

Abstract: We discuss the interplay between electronic correlations and an underlying superlattice structure in determining the period of charge density waves ͑CDW's͒, by considering a one-dimensional Hubbard model with a repeated ͑nonrandom͒ pattern of repulsive ͑U Ͼ 0͒ and free ͑U =0͒ sites. Density matrix renormalization group diagonalization of finite systems ͑up to 120 sites͒ is used to calculate the charge-density correlation function and structure factor in the ground state. The modulation period can still be pred… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19] For considerable insight into the nonrandom inhomogeneous systems such as magnetic multilayer and superlattice, [20][21][22][23] a 1D superlattice model with periodic arrangement of repulsive and free sites, but with constant orbital energy, has been widely studied for many different unit cell configurations and electron fillings. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The Mott-Hubbard insulator sets in at filling density ρ I for these superlattice structures, [25] not at halffilling as in the Hubbard model. The period of SDW and the profile of local moment have rich properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[19] For considerable insight into the nonrandom inhomogeneous systems such as magnetic multilayer and superlattice, [20][21][22][23] a 1D superlattice model with periodic arrangement of repulsive and free sites, but with constant orbital energy, has been widely studied for many different unit cell configurations and electron fillings. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] The Mott-Hubbard insulator sets in at filling density ρ I for these superlattice structures, [25] not at halffilling as in the Hubbard model. The period of SDW and the profile of local moment have rich properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the simplest case, we have U A = 0 and U B = 0. Such a model was previously investigated for its various properties that are different from the homogeneous chain: transfer of the magnetic momentum to the free sites 39 , the appearance of a giant magnetoresistance effect 40,41 , a Mott insulator transition that may occur at fillings other than half filling 42 , and the formation of a modulated and potentially incommensurate charge-density wave [43][44][45] . However, we note that in contrast to previous studies, our model includes alternating on-site energies instead of a homogeneous chemical potential.…”
Section: B Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superlattice model corresponding to U B = = 0 in equation ( 1) has even been proposed for magnetic metallic multilayers [15]. The magnetism, the MIT and the chargedensity wave have been studied for electronic density away from half-filling [16][17][18]. However, no phase transition was observed at half-filling since the orbital energy = 0 was chosen in these works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%