2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of auditory percepts by transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16,21]). A contribution from generic (speech-unspecific) central auditory processes is supported by (1) the fact that our two-talker results closely resemble results from a matching TACS study with non-speech sounds [42], (2) findings from other non-speech-entrainment studies [43], and (3) no evidence for TACS effects on peripheral auditory processing [44]. This notion may be tested in the future by combining envTCS with simultaneous neuroimaging or electrophysiology [45] and directly comparing envTCS-induced neural response modulations for speech stimuli versus nonspeech equivalents [46].…”
Section: Which Processes Underlie the Observed Envtcs Effects On Speech-recognition Performance?supporting
confidence: 59%
“…[16,21]). A contribution from generic (speech-unspecific) central auditory processes is supported by (1) the fact that our two-talker results closely resemble results from a matching TACS study with non-speech sounds [42], (2) findings from other non-speech-entrainment studies [43], and (3) no evidence for TACS effects on peripheral auditory processing [44]. This notion may be tested in the future by combining envTCS with simultaneous neuroimaging or electrophysiology [45] and directly comparing envTCS-induced neural response modulations for speech stimuli versus nonspeech equivalents [46].…”
Section: Which Processes Underlie the Observed Envtcs Effects On Speech-recognition Performance?supporting
confidence: 59%
“…On the other hand, it is possible that our hypothesis that TACS at conventional intensities alters OHC function is false. We think this latter interpretation is more plausible, because it agrees with recent results showing no effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation on DPOAE [8,9]. It remains to be investigated whether auditory effects of TACS originate at a different auditory processing stage than OHCs, for example, the auditory nerve, brainstem, or cerebral cortex (see Supplementary Material S3).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, we did not observe such enhancement in the contralateral V1 & V2 and thalamus, indicating differences in hemispheric modulatory effects by the vestibular system on sensory processing. Proposed multisensory processing mechanisms rely on hemispheric dominance or lateralization of vestibular functions (38, 55, 5759). In particular, the activity dominance shown in our study shifted to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulated vestibular labyrinth and VN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%