2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of attention functions by anodal tDCS on right PPC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, an enhancement of cortical-evoked potentials after prefrontal PAS25 was demonstrated via TMS-EEG 88 . Since cognitive functions that are affected by nicotine abstinence, such as working memory, episodic memory and attention 20 are related to the prefrontal cortex 8992 and can also be modulated by non-invasive brain stimulation protocols 93, 94 as well as nicotinic agents 13 , it would be relevant and feasible to focus the future exploration of nicotine withdrawal-related plasticity shifts directly on prefrontal cortex physiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an enhancement of cortical-evoked potentials after prefrontal PAS25 was demonstrated via TMS-EEG 88 . Since cognitive functions that are affected by nicotine abstinence, such as working memory, episodic memory and attention 20 are related to the prefrontal cortex 8992 and can also be modulated by non-invasive brain stimulation protocols 93, 94 as well as nicotinic agents 13 , it would be relevant and feasible to focus the future exploration of nicotine withdrawal-related plasticity shifts directly on prefrontal cortex physiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, these different outcomes very much underpin our earlier points in terms of the need of establishing tES protocols, not only for duration and stimulation strength but also regarding baseline task performance, polarity, size of the stimulation field, pre-activation dependant and inter-individual effects (see also Shin et al (2015), Roy et al (2015). Moreover, related to this last point, unlike for TMS, there is no calibration of stimulation intensity in tES.…”
Section: Uncovering Spatial Attention With Tes Tdcs and Arousal With mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We hope that the following studies justify our optimism. Roy et al (2015) investigated the effects of tDCS on a version of the attention network test (ANT, Fan et al, 2002) assessing its influence on alerting and spatial re-orienting as well as executive function. Over 4 different days they applied 1.5 mA anodal TDCS for 20 min (active and sham) over left dorso-lateral (EEG F3), left parietal (EEG P3) and right parietal (EEG P4) sites.…”
Section: Uncovering Spatial Attention With Tes Tdcs and Arousal With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent study in which both hemispheres received opposite polarity stimulation did not identify any significant effect on performance (Li et al 2015a). Using a more comprehensive version of Posner's paradigm that also measures alerting and executive attention-the attention network test (Fan et al 2002)-Roy et al (2015 found that anodal tDCS to the right parietal cortex decreased performance after invalid exogenous cues. Stimulation over the right inferior frontal cortex did not seem to affect orienting in the attention network test , although here, participants did not perform the test until 1.5 h after stimulation offset.…”
Section: Endogenous and Exogenous Orientingmentioning
confidence: 99%