2021
DOI: 10.1002/srin.202100534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulating Mechanical Properties of Fe–0.35C–3.2Al–5Mn Hot‐Rolled Steel by Combining Twinning‐Induced Plasticity plus Transformation‐Induced Plasticity Effect

Abstract: The microstructures and mechanical properties of Fe–0.35C–3.2Al–5Mn (in wt%, same later) hot‐rolled medium‐manganese steels are systematically investigated. The results show that ultrafine‐grained duplex phases with bimodal morphologies of lath and equiaxed are obtained with intercritical annealing at 750 °C for 1 h, along with ultimate tensile strength of 950 MPa and total elongation of 71.2%, attributed to the dislocation slip and deformation of ferrite matrix, accompanied by the synergetic twinning of retai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grain boundaries are the most common nucleation sites of austenite in MMS. [19][20][21][22] The classical nucleation theory suggests that the nucleation at grain boundaries could reduce the interfacial energy barrier, thereby reducing the nucleation formation energy. [23][24][25] Alternatively, the recently developed nucleation models indicate that the Mn segregation into boundaries is responsible for this kind of austenitic nucleation because it leads to the higher thermodynamic driving force for the reverse transformation in the interfacial region.…”
Section: Nucleation At (Sub)grain Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain boundaries are the most common nucleation sites of austenite in MMS. [19][20][21][22] The classical nucleation theory suggests that the nucleation at grain boundaries could reduce the interfacial energy barrier, thereby reducing the nucleation formation energy. [23][24][25] Alternatively, the recently developed nucleation models indicate that the Mn segregation into boundaries is responsible for this kind of austenitic nucleation because it leads to the higher thermodynamic driving force for the reverse transformation in the interfacial region.…”
Section: Nucleation At (Sub)grain Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%