2017
DOI: 10.1002/adbi.201700093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulating Immunological Responses of Electrospun Fibers for Tissue Engineering

Abstract: The promise of tissue engineering is to improve or restore functions of impaired tissues or organs. However, one of the biggest challenges to its translation to clinical applications is the lack of tissue integration and functionality. The plethora of cellular and molecular events occurring following scaffold implantation is a major bottleneck. Recent studies confirmed that inflammation is a crucial component influencing tissue regeneration. Immuno‐modulation or immune‐engineering has been proposed as a potent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
(163 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was noted that the gene expression of the M2 marker CD206 and the anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL-4 and IL-10 were enhanced by exosome-functionalized scaffolds, possibly because of the added influence of the scaffold’s microenvironment ( Fig. 1, F to H ) ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that the gene expression of the M2 marker CD206 and the anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL-4 and IL-10 were enhanced by exosome-functionalized scaffolds, possibly because of the added influence of the scaffold’s microenvironment ( Fig. 1, F to H ) ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of the degradation study was that only functional mechanical performance was evaluated and not mass loss, which would have added value in the current study. The difference in cell infiltration and subsequent amount of peritracheal reactive mass between the PCL and PCL/PLCL nanofibers may potentially be attributed to different inflammatory responses to the materials [42]. The faster-degrading PLCL material may potentially have less inflammatory tissue due to a faster degradation time compared to PCL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenotype of macrophages is generally used to evaluate the timing and magnitude of inflammation and is the most important determinant of the biological performance of biomaterials [16,26,27]. Pro-inflammatory macrophages (M1) are master immune cells responsible for recruiting other immune cells to the interface of implants, clearing foreign pathogens by phagocytosis, and activating both the complement and adaptive immune systems [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%