2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00298-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulated cortical control of individual fingers in experienced musicians: an EEG study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar relations between peak force and indices of finger interaction were also reported in a study of the effects of fatigue on finger interaction in young healthy subjects (Danion et al 2000). Musicians have been reported to show smaller enslaving as compared to control subjects (Slobounov et al 2002). All these studies compared subject subpopulations that had major differences in their abilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar relations between peak force and indices of finger interaction were also reported in a study of the effects of fatigue on finger interaction in young healthy subjects (Danion et al 2000). Musicians have been reported to show smaller enslaving as compared to control subjects (Slobounov et al 2002). All these studies compared subject subpopulations that had major differences in their abilities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The general population may be expected to show both similarities and differences in the way their central nervous system organizes finger interaction. These differences may be related to such gross characteristics as the amount of total maximal finger force a person can produce (Shinohara et al 2003) or to more subtle individual factors such as experience with particular tasks that require precise finger coordination (Slobounov et al 2002). An IFM for a hand contains 16 numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the apparent overlap between finger representations is not entirely clear, since activation by a finger depends on such factors as the type of movement (e.g., flexion vs. extension), coordination between muscles (both agonists and antagonists), trajectory of movement, sequence of finger movements, and stabilization of joints other than the those moved (Georgopoulos et al 1999;Sanes and Donoghue 2000;Schieber 1999Schieber , 2001Schieber and Hibbard 1993;Volkmann et al 1998). Because fingers show varying degrees of codependence or "enslavement" (Slobounov et al 2002), these methods do not necessarily demonstrate whether the same area of cortex is directly involved in initiating movements of more than one finger. On the other hand, the area of cortex predominantly associated with each finger's movement can be better localized by contrasting between fingers (Dechent and Frahm 2003;Kleinschmidt et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the assumption of stable enslaving allowed the introduction of the notion of finger modes Danion et al 2003), which has been used in many studies of multifinger synergies within the framework of the UCM hypothesis (starting from Latash et al 2001;reviewed in Latash et al 2007;. Changes in enslaving have been documented over years of specialized practice (Slobounov et al 2002), with healthy aging (Shinohara et al 2003, and with neurological disorder (Park et al 2012). Several recent studies have provided evidence for changes in enslaving occurring relatively quickly, over a single 1-h session involving finger fatigue or specialized practice (Singh et al 2010;Wu et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%