2023
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-j01nk
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular Software for Generating and Modelling Diverse Polymer Databases

Abstract: Machine learning methods offer the opportunity to design new functional materials on an unprecedented scale however building the large, diverse databases of molecules on which to train such methods remains a daunting task. Automated computational chemistry modelling workflows are therefore becoming essential tools in this data-driven hunt for new materials with novel properties, since they offer a workflow by which to create and curate molecular databases without requiring significant levels of user input. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many recent polymer builders, whose capabilities and particularities are summarized in the Supporting Information, the charge assignation is often not explicitly discussed. [69][70][71][72][73][74][75] On the other hand, Polyply 76 uses parameterized charges from GROMOS 2016H66 FF, 77 Polymatic 78 works with the charges provided by the user, Polymer Structure Predictor 79 uses monomer charges calculated on isolated monomers, and BIOVIA Materials Studio 80 permits to use FF-defined charges, charges obtained from Qeq, 81 or from Gasteiger 82 methodology. To account for the local environment of the monomer to some extent while keeping the computational cost manageable, oligomers of the homopolymeric systems were considered.Within this simplified setup, the atomic charges are calculated based on the AM1-BCC approach 66,67 and stored for each atom of the three different parts (head, repeat unit, tail).…”
Section: Challenges Of Setting Up Polymer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many recent polymer builders, whose capabilities and particularities are summarized in the Supporting Information, the charge assignation is often not explicitly discussed. [69][70][71][72][73][74][75] On the other hand, Polyply 76 uses parameterized charges from GROMOS 2016H66 FF, 77 Polymatic 78 works with the charges provided by the user, Polymer Structure Predictor 79 uses monomer charges calculated on isolated monomers, and BIOVIA Materials Studio 80 permits to use FF-defined charges, charges obtained from Qeq, 81 or from Gasteiger 82 methodology. To account for the local environment of the monomer to some extent while keeping the computational cost manageable, oligomers of the homopolymeric systems were considered.Within this simplified setup, the atomic charges are calculated based on the AM1-BCC approach 66,67 and stored for each atom of the three different parts (head, repeat unit, tail).…”
Section: Challenges Of Setting Up Polymer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 PySoftK, the latest Python module capable of generating branched and cyclic copolymer structures, lacks user-defined systems, thus making it challenging to create more complex structures as desired by users, such as hyperbranched star, intricate cyclic, and net. 17 Apart from predefined templates, polymer structure creation can be achieved by predicting polymerization reactions between monomers to form polymer chains. 18−21 However, these predictions may sometimes yield inaccurate results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%