2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular product platforming with supply chain postponement decisions by leader-follower interactive optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And the features of the papers we mention below are summarised in Tables 3 and 4. A metric approach to evaluate the influence of design variety on the overall generated value of the product Jiao [9] DFMC is to achieve product variety by adopting modularity and commonality so as to reuse design among product families Smith et al [10] The modularity of product architecture improves the cost-effectiveness in mass customisation Hu et al [11] Summarise the concepts and technologies about DFMC, including the product family and product architecture Aggarwal et al [12] Develop a module-based service family design for mass customisation Kristianto et al [13] Consider the configuration and re-configuration of the product platform Wang et al [14] Investigate the relationships between product modularity and DFMC Bonev et al [15] Propose a formal approach for the design and customisation of the entire product family Yang and Jiao [16] Game-theoretical method to jointly decide the optimal configuration of the product family design and supply chain Marchesi and Matt [17] Consider the sustainability of mass production in the domain of product platform development Xu et al [18] Propose a decision support model to assist manufacturers to optimise the product design process Viana et al [19] Investigate the impact of product modularity on the DFMC Yang et al [20] Consider the components' selection and procurements Xiong et al [21] Modular product platform configuration and supply chain configuration Sabioni et al [22] Reconfigurable manufacturing systems, modular product design T A B L E 4 Summary of DFMC papers: process variety…”
Section: Design For Mass Customisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…And the features of the papers we mention below are summarised in Tables 3 and 4. A metric approach to evaluate the influence of design variety on the overall generated value of the product Jiao [9] DFMC is to achieve product variety by adopting modularity and commonality so as to reuse design among product families Smith et al [10] The modularity of product architecture improves the cost-effectiveness in mass customisation Hu et al [11] Summarise the concepts and technologies about DFMC, including the product family and product architecture Aggarwal et al [12] Develop a module-based service family design for mass customisation Kristianto et al [13] Consider the configuration and re-configuration of the product platform Wang et al [14] Investigate the relationships between product modularity and DFMC Bonev et al [15] Propose a formal approach for the design and customisation of the entire product family Yang and Jiao [16] Game-theoretical method to jointly decide the optimal configuration of the product family design and supply chain Marchesi and Matt [17] Consider the sustainability of mass production in the domain of product platform development Xu et al [18] Propose a decision support model to assist manufacturers to optimise the product design process Viana et al [19] Investigate the impact of product modularity on the DFMC Yang et al [20] Consider the components' selection and procurements Xiong et al [21] Modular product platform configuration and supply chain configuration Sabioni et al [22] Reconfigurable manufacturing systems, modular product design T A B L E 4 Summary of DFMC papers: process variety…”
Section: Design For Mass Customisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case study of the power transformer product family architecting subject to make-or-buy considerations is introduced to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model and algorithm. Xiong et al [21] formulate an integrated optimisation problem involving modular product platforming decisions with supply chain postponement as a Stackelberg game that needs joint optimisation for interactive evaluation of product modularity and supply chain fulfilment costs. Also, this work proposes a nested genetic algorithm like Liu et al [76] to solve the optimisation problem.…”
Section: Supplier Manufacture Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, some authors claim that it is possible to increase variety without affecting the fill rate. Alternatives such as modularity (Pero et al , 2010), process standardization (Salvador et al , 2002), manufacturing flexibility (Rajagopalan and Xia, 2012), mass customization (ElMaraghy et al , 2013) and postponement (Er and MacCarthy, 2006; Xiong et al , 2018) are widely used to provide greater product variety and good fill rate at the same time (Appelqvist and Gubi, 2005). Considering that alignment of new products and supply chains is key for success (Pero et al , 2010), practices related to the design-for-variety (DFV) may also provide some positive impact on service performance (Boer and Boer, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the technology improvements, platforms are widely used in economic life (Anderson et al, 2013;Cheng et al, 2019). Firms are willing to join platforms to generate economic benefits (Zhang, 2015;Xiong et al, 2018;Du et al, 2019). Just as Cusumano (2010) says, firms that seek for "platform" strategies are increasingly at an advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%