2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0lc00939c
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular off-chip emulsion generator enabled by a revolving needle

Abstract: Microfluidics chips have demonstrated unparalleled abilities in droplet generation, including precise control over droplet size and monodispersity. And yet, their rather complicated microfabrication process and operation can be a barrier...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 reported an off-chip droplet generator enabled by a 34G needle and a spanning conical frustum; however, the large conical frustum limited its use in small containers, such as centrifuge tubes. Although alternative methods, using a revolving needle for generating microdroplets in a centrifuge tube, have been presented, 18, 21 they induced strong vortices that consequently undermine their utilities in miniaturized containers like microwells of the multi-well plate due to generated droplets could be smashed by vortices. 21 Other two capillary-based approaches circumvented this limitation but showed narrow monodisperse ranges and difficulties in droplet size control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…19 reported an off-chip droplet generator enabled by a 34G needle and a spanning conical frustum; however, the large conical frustum limited its use in small containers, such as centrifuge tubes. Although alternative methods, using a revolving needle for generating microdroplets in a centrifuge tube, have been presented, 18, 21 they induced strong vortices that consequently undermine their utilities in miniaturized containers like microwells of the multi-well plate due to generated droplets could be smashed by vortices. 21 Other two capillary-based approaches circumvented this limitation but showed narrow monodisperse ranges and difficulties in droplet size control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…710 T-junction and flow-focusing designs are commonly used for droplet generation due to geometrical simplicity. 1116 Unfortunately, chip-based droplet microfluidics suffers from the following drawbacks: 1) the devices are usually fabricated using time-consuming, labor-intensive photolithography and etching process with cost-prohibitive specialized equipment in cleanrooms; 1720 2) the chip fabrication and operation are complicated, which is a technical barrier for inexperienced researchers; 18,19,21 3) it is difficult to precisely define droplet volumes by using multiple pumps and synchronizing several factors ( e.g ., flow rate, fluid viscosity, channel geometry, and surface tension); 20, 22 These limitations hinder the prevalence of chip-based droplet generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of these beneficial qualities, embedded droplet printing has demonstrated unique functionality in a wide variety of fluidic manipulation applications including chemical synthesis and screening, biological assays, and particle synthesis. There are many techniques for droplet generation and processing including open and off‐chip microfluidic systems, [ 13,14 ] in‐air microfluidics, [ 15 ] and droplet formation and deposition at a fluid interface. [ 16–19 ] However, embedded droplet printing is the only method (other than a microgravity environment) that allows for droplet processing in an “absolutely quiescent” state, namely the elimination of exterior convective forces as well as essentially indefinite spatial isolation of droplets from each other and from any boundaries of the bath material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%