1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01388656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular forms and de Rham cohomology; Atkin-Swinnerton-Dyer congruences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly this fact is not well known. It appeared for the first time implicitly in the work of Coleman [13] on p-adic modular forms, and later in [11,[21][22][23]. A direct proof in the case of level one was given in [6].…”
Section: Weakly Holomorphic Modular Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surprisingly this fact is not well known. It appeared for the first time implicitly in the work of Coleman [13] on p-adic modular forms, and later in [11,[21][22][23]. A direct proof in the case of level one was given in [6].…”
Section: Weakly Holomorphic Modular Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n+2 /D n+1 M ! −n can be interpreted as a space of modular forms of the second kind [6,11,23]. Indeed, it is canonically isomorphic to the algebraic de Rham cohomology of the moduli stack of elliptic curves with certain coefficients, and in particular, admits an action by Hecke operators.…”
Section: Real Frobeniusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study of modular forms for noncongruence subgroups was initiated by Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer [ASD], and continued in a sequence of papers [Sc1,Sc3,Sc4,Sc5,Sc6] by Scholl. Compared with what we know for forms for congruence subgroups, the overall knowledge on the arithmetic properties of forms for noncongruence subgroups, however, is far from satisfactory. Let Γ be a noncongruence subgroup of SL 2 (Z) with finite index.…”
Section: Modular Forms For Noncongruence Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atkin and Swinnerton-Dyer [ASD] pioneered the research in this area; they laid foundations and made a remarkable observation on the congruence property of Fourier coefficients of cusp forms for noncongruence subgroups, which we call Atkin-Swinnerton-Dyer congruences. Scholl [Sc1] attaches to the space of cusp forms of a given weight for a noncongruence subgroup a compatible family of l-adic Galois representations and proves that the Fourier coefficients of all cusp forms in the space satisfy certain congruence relations arising from the characteristic polynomials of the Frobenius elements. In case the space is one-dimensional, Scholl's result implies the Atkin-Swinnerton-Dyer congruences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%