2008
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2008.926769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular Fast Direct Electromagnetic Analysis Using Local-Global Solution Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we need to use the capacitance C generated from a full-matrix based direct computation to assess the accuracy of the capacitance C' extracted by the proposed solver, and C is not available within feasible computational resources for this large example, we tested the solution error of the proposed solver which is defined as The best complexity reported for the IE-based direct solver is O(Nlog α N) [10,[24][25][26], which is higher than O(N). Next, we compare the proposed linear direct solver with an O(Nlog 2 N) complexity -based direct solver [10][11][12]26].…”
Section: |mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since we need to use the capacitance C generated from a full-matrix based direct computation to assess the accuracy of the capacitance C' extracted by the proposed solver, and C is not available within feasible computational resources for this large example, we tested the solution error of the proposed solver which is defined as The best complexity reported for the IE-based direct solver is O(Nlog α N) [10,[24][25][26], which is higher than O(N). Next, we compare the proposed linear direct solver with an O(Nlog 2 N) complexity -based direct solver [10][11][12]26].…”
Section: |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), where N it denotes the total number of iterations required to reach convergence, and N rhs is the number of right hand sides. In state-of-the-art IE-based solvers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]22], fast multipole method and hierarchical algorithms were used to perform a matrix-vector multiplication in O(N) complexity, thereby significantly reducing the complexity of iterative solvers; efficient preconditioners [8][9] were developed to reduce the number of iterations; in the limited work reported on the direct IE solutions [6,10,22,24,25], the best complexity is shown to be O(Nlog α N). No linear complexity has been achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fast and parallel algorithms such as the fast multipole method (FMM) [15][16][17][18], hybrid FMM and fast Fourier transform (FFT) [19], and parallel adaptive integral method [20,21] have been developed to accelerate the dense matrix-vector product (MVP). Other significant developments include the parallel higher-order method of moments [22] and fast direct solver of the SIE linear system [23][24][25]. With these advancements, the solutions with over several hundred millions and a billion unknowns have been possible [17,18,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F AST direct integral-equation methods are important in many engineering applications, for instance, design optimization and simulating high-Q structures [1] [2]. Matrix compression is a key because arithmetic operations of compressed matrix blocks involve less floating point operations (FLOPs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix compression is a key because arithmetic operations of compressed matrix blocks involve less floating point operations (FLOPs). Studies show much improved computational efficiency when these methods were applied to metallic structures [1] [2]. In this article, we propose a Quasi Block Cholesky (QBC) algorithm for fast direct solution of the Poggio-Miller-Chang-Harrington-Wu-Tsai (PM-CHWT) formulation for dielectric bodies [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%