2006
DOI: 10.1577/t05-202.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular Experimental Riffle–Pool Stream System

Abstract: We describe a modular method for building a large, outdoor experimental stream system that has great flexibility for research projects in fish ecology, behavior, conservation, or management. The system has been in use for more than a decade at the University of Oklahoma Biological Station (Kingston, Oklahoma) and has been used with modification at four other research facilities in the Midwest. Here, we document the system in detail, including specifications for construction of the original system and modificat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, many of the biotic properties of the mesocosms that could be affected by CO 2 limitation (e.g., chlorophyll-a and benthic invertebrates) also fell within the range of conditions observed in a natural system ( Table 1). As with other experimental stream mesocosms that have provided realistic conditions to test a variety of ecosystem, community, and population-level questions in stream ecology (e.g., Matthews et al, 2006), we believe the mesocosms used in this study provided a set of reasonably realistic conditions for testing the effects of eCO 2 on ecosystem processes and functions occurring at local scales within small, sand-bottom temperate streams.…”
Section: Stream Mesocosmsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Likewise, many of the biotic properties of the mesocosms that could be affected by CO 2 limitation (e.g., chlorophyll-a and benthic invertebrates) also fell within the range of conditions observed in a natural system ( Table 1). As with other experimental stream mesocosms that have provided realistic conditions to test a variety of ecosystem, community, and population-level questions in stream ecology (e.g., Matthews et al, 2006), we believe the mesocosms used in this study provided a set of reasonably realistic conditions for testing the effects of eCO 2 on ecosystem processes and functions occurring at local scales within small, sand-bottom temperate streams.…”
Section: Stream Mesocosmsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Each mesocosm consisted of a 2.54-m 2 circular pool (mean depth = 0.5 m) downstream of a 0.84-m 2 rectangular riffle (mean depth = 0.15 m) (see Matthews et al 2006 for details of mesocosm design). Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes (1 m 3 2.5 cm inner diameter) were placed vertically in the substratum of each pool with the open bottom of the tube ,0.5 m below the surface of the substratum to measure hyporheic dissolved O 2 (DO).…”
Section: Description Of Experimental Streams and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fully acknowledge that darter and salamander distributions within a drainage may also be limited by stream flow/depth and other abiotic variables, and further research is warranted to tease apart which mechanism (i.e., competition or habitat) drives their distributions. Alternatively, no interactions (e.g., competitive or aggressive) between Coosa darters and salamanders may exist, and the weight loss is directly related to the darters' sensitivity to captivity; however, several other darter species (Etheostoma grahami [Girard], Etheostoma radiosum [Hubbs and Black], Etheostoma spectabile [Agassiz], Percina copelandi [Jordan], Ammocrypta beani Jordan, and Ammocrypta vivax Hay) have been successfully maintained and even reproduced in closed, recirculation systems (Matthews et al, 2006;Spaeth, 2008). Therefore, the loss of weight could likely be attributed to asymmetric competition with black-bellied salamanders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%