2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulability and duality of certain cones in pluripotential theory

Abstract: ModulabilityOrdered vector space Quasi-Banach space Topological dual Let p > 0, and let E p denote the cone of negative plurisubharmonic functions with finite pluricomplex p-energy. We prove that the vector space δE p = E p − E p , with the vector ordering induced by the cone E p is σ -Dedekind complete, and equipped with a suitable quasi-norm it is a non-separable quasi-Banach space with a decomposition property with control of the quasi-norm. Furthermore, we explicitly characterize its topological dual. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was proved in [3] (see also [4]) that for p = 1 the constant D(n, p) in Theorem 2.1 is strictly great than 1. For this reason we can not use similar variational method to prove the Dirichlet principle in the class E p when p = 1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved in [3] (see also [4]) that for p = 1 the constant D(n, p) in Theorem 2.1 is strictly great than 1. For this reason we can not use similar variational method to prove the Dirichlet principle in the class E p when p = 1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We start with the definition of msubharmonic functions and the m-Hessian operator. Let Ω ⊂ C n , n ≥ 2, be a bounded domain, 1 ≤ m ≤ n, and define C (1,1) to be the set of (1, 1)-forms with constant coefficients. With this set…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved in [1,34] that (δE p,k , · ) is a quasi-Banach space for p = 1, and a Banach space for p = 1. Furthermore, the cone E p,k (Ω) is closed in δE p,k (Ω).…”
Section: Definition 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proposition 2. 4 Let n ≥ 2, 1 ≤ m ≤ n, and assume that ⊂ C n is an m-hyperconvex domain, and u, v ∈ E p,m ( ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%