2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifying hernia mesh design to improve device mechanical performance and promote tension-free repair

Abstract: Testing demonstrates that the modified mesh outperforms SOC mesh and suture in all tested failure modes. SOC hernia mesh tears through tissue at stress levels below maximum physiologic stress, whereas, the modified hernia mesh is up to 200% stronger than SOC mesh at resisting suture tearing through tissue and maintains anchoring at stresses far beyond clinically relevant benchmarks. Modifying hernia mesh design significantly improves device mechanical performance and enhances tension-free repair.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As these locations have high stress concentrations within the material, they tend to be more reactive than the areas where fibers are relaxed. This elucidates why modifying knit design can improve mesh mechanical performance, such as in the study mentioned in the introduction [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As these locations have high stress concentrations within the material, they tend to be more reactive than the areas where fibers are relaxed. This elucidates why modifying knit design can improve mesh mechanical performance, such as in the study mentioned in the introduction [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These include alterations in a pore size and shape, transition from a heavyweight to a lightweight mesh, knitting design of the fibers, etc. Levinson et al showed that modifying the knits in the mesh significantly improves device mechanical performance and enhances tension-free repair [11]. Lightweight mesh has been reported to induce fewer peritoneal adhesions than a heavyweight mesh does [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ibrahim et al. designed a novel anchorage-knotting system for the mesh with an increased extension anchor area to reduce tension experienced at the anchor point, leading to decreased risk of rupture at the interface . In the analysis of a porcine abdominal wall model, the modified mesh was 2-fold stronger than the conventional mesh in terms of resisting suture tearing and maintained anchoring at stresses exceeding clinically relevant benchmarks, decreasing tension at the local suture sites.…”
Section: Functional Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Physical properties [ 97 , 98 ] Risk of hernia recurrence due to insufficient mechanical properties. Appearance, physical dimensions (thickness) [ 23 ], monofilament diameter [ 22 ], pore properties [ 23 , 99 ] (pore size, pore density, porosity), weight per unit area/Density [ 23 , [100] , [101] , [102] ], uniaxial tensile strength [ 23 , 100 , [103] , [104] , [105] , [106] ], tensile elongation [ 106 , 107 ], burst strength [ 23 , 100 , 104 ], suture retention [ 23 , 100 , 104 ], suture pullout strength [ 108 ], connection strength between components and layers (when applicable), tear resistance [ 23 , 100 , 104 ] (when applicable), fading test (when applicable), stiffness [ 109 ]. Chemical properties Toxic reaction due to chemical residues.…”
Section: Current Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%