2017
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2017.2705343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifying Backoff Freezing Mechanism to Optimize Dense IEEE 802.11 Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the backoff scheme proposed in Ref. [15], stations do not attempt to tune the contention window but make a small modification in the backoff freezing process to determine the optimal configuration, which improves network throughput even under densely populated networks. The Exponential Increased exponential decreased (EIED) backoff algorithm under fading channel errors was modeled by a discrete time Markov chain, and the EIED is better than the traditional backoff scheme under saturated throughput with fading channel errors [16] .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the backoff scheme proposed in Ref. [15], stations do not attempt to tune the contention window but make a small modification in the backoff freezing process to determine the optimal configuration, which improves network throughput even under densely populated networks. The Exponential Increased exponential decreased (EIED) backoff algorithm under fading channel errors was modeled by a discrete time Markov chain, and the EIED is better than the traditional backoff scheme under saturated throughput with fading channel errors [16] .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the above algorithms can be applied to a dynamic network environment, they need to be simultaneously executed on nodes and AP and result in extra operating cost. Therefore, [15] and [16] present two algorithms that do not require any hardware modifications and only run on nodes. In [15], all of the nodes decrease the back-off counter with a certain probability that can be calculated by some available network parameters during the idle time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, [15] and [16] present two algorithms that do not require any hardware modifications and only run on nodes. In [15], all of the nodes decrease the back-off counter with a certain probability that can be calculated by some available network parameters during the idle time. In [16], the AP can calculate and assign a back-off value for nodes by running a VBA algorithm in the back-off stage after nodes successfully transmit.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CCT-SDN, the data transmission of the uplink utilizes the DCF mechanism with BEB [33]. However, the downlink transmission decision of APs is made by the controller governed by our concurrent transmission decision algorithm.…”
Section: Concurrent Transmission Decision Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%