Modified Usability Framework for Disaster Apps: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of User Reviews

Abstract

The public has access to a range of mobile applications (apps) for disasters. However, there has been limited academic research conducted on disaster apps and how the public perceives their usability. This study explores end-users’ perceptions of the usability of disaster apps. It proposes a conceptual framework based on insights gathered from thematically analyzing online reviews. The study identifies new usability concerns particular to disaster apps’ use: (1) content relevance depends on the app’s purpose and the proximate significance of the information to the hazard event’s time and location; (2) app dependability affects users’ perceptions of usability due to the life-safety association of disaster apps; (3) users perceive advertisements to contribute to their cognitive load; (4) users expect apps to work efficiently without unnecessary consumption of critical phone resources; (5) appropriate audio interface can improve usability, as sounds can boost an app’s alerting aspect; and, finally (6) in-app browsing may potentially enhance users’ impression of the structure of a disaster app. As a result, this study argues for focussed research and development on public-facing disaster apps. Future research should consider the conceptual framework and concerns presented in this study when building design guidelines and theories for disaster apps.

Review of different methods and techniques used for flood vulnerability analysis

“…The social vulnerability evaluation concentrates on features of potential weaknesses capacities of the human population (Tan et al 2020…”

Time constructs: Design ideology and a future internet

“…IoT devices can be unreliable because they are enormously taxing on network bandwidth (Celic and Magjarevic, 2020; Nicolescu et al, 2018). Emergency and natural disaster notifications often come too late or miss entire swaths of mobile users (Cobb et al, 2014; Tan et al, 2020). Furthermore, numerous critical studies of communication technologies have focused on how applications like Google and Facebook monitor users’ activity to capitalize on fleeting seconds of their attention to predict their future desires and consumption patterns (McChesney, 2001; Noble, 2018; Vaidhyanathan, 2018; Wu, 2016; Zuboff, 2019).…”

Bridging from Crisis to Everyday Life – An Analysis of User Reviews of the Warning App NINA and the COVID-19 Regulation Apps CoroBuddy and DarfIchDas

“…An analysis of warning apps revealed that malfunctions and the temporal and spatial relevance of warnings are main concerns [30]. Furthermore, dependability, avoidance of advertisement, resource efficiency, appropriate audio interface for alerting, and avoidance of in-app browsing are usability requirements that are particular to warning apps [52]. Research suggests that even during the COVID-19 crisis, pandemics were infrequently mentioned as hazards that should be included in a multi-hazard warning app [12].…”

“…App store reviews, which contain bug reports, feature strengths or shortcomings, user requests, praise, complaints, and/or usage scenarios [19] have been successfully used to gain insights into warning app usability issues [30,52]. Written by users who are specifically motivated to share their experiences, as a crowdsourced task to identify the best app for a specific purpose [29] or to increase pressure on the developers [40], they are not necessarily representative of the average app's user.…”