2002
DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200201000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Tibial Nails for Treating Distal Tibia Fractures

Abstract: Removal of one centimeter from the tip of a tibial nail allows placement of two distal interlocking screws in tibial fractures located four centimeters from the tibiotalar joint. The fixation strength achieved is comparable to that of standard intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures located five centimeters from the tibiotalar joint using two distal interlocking screws. Fixation strength with these distal fractures, however, is not strong enough to resist moderate compression-bending loads. Thus, patients w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A further option for metaphyseal fractures located 4-5 cm proximal to the ankle joint is intra-medullary nailing, possibly cutting one centimetre off the tip of a tibial nail thus allowing placement of two distal interlocking screws [9,13]. However, fixation strength with these distal fractures is not high enough to resist even moderate compression and bending loads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A further option for metaphyseal fractures located 4-5 cm proximal to the ankle joint is intra-medullary nailing, possibly cutting one centimetre off the tip of a tibial nail thus allowing placement of two distal interlocking screws [9,13]. However, fixation strength with these distal fractures is not high enough to resist even moderate compression and bending loads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, fixation strength with these distal fractures is not high enough to resist even moderate compression and bending loads. Thus, patients with distal tibia fractures treated with intra-medullary nailing must follow weight-bearing restrictions until significant fracture healing occurs to prevent malalignment [9]. Also, this technique is ill-suited to the management of the intra-articular component of distal tibial fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also well documented that the placement of two distal screws increases the stiffness and strength of the bone-implant construct, thus leading to enhanced mechanical stability of the fixed fracture. 20 In our series distal tibial fractures were treated with a reamed intramedullary nailing system that increases distal fixation by two distal interlocking screws passing through the distal 0.5 cm to 1.5 cm from the tip of the nail. The design of the nail allows one mediolateral and one anteroposterior screw for better stabilization of the distal fragment.…”
Section: Figure 6: Showing Distribution Post-operative Complications mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies demonstrate the benefits of differing implants used on different individuals with dissimilar injuries in disparate time periods. [16][17][18][19] Although the finer points of technique may be debated, without the required surgical skills, the prognosis is threatened regardless of which philosophy is chosen. With concerns evident regarding the training of junior doctors, [20][21][22][23] it is timely to assess the experiences of current UK orthopaedic trainees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%