2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31387-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified RNA triplexes: Thermodynamics, structure and biological potential

Abstract: The occurrence of triplexes in vivo has been well documented and is determined by the presence of long homopurine-homopyrimidine tracts. The formation of these structures is the result of conformational changes that occur in the duplex, which allow the binding of a third strand within the major groove of the helix. Formation of these noncanonical forms by introducing synthetic triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) into the cell may have applications in molecular biology, diagnostics and therapy. This study f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to T-to-U substitutions, T-to-s 2 U substitutions in PNAs may result in more significant strengthening of triplex formation, due to a reduced energy required for the dehydration, enhanced base stacking, in addition to a strengthened hydrogen bonding interaction. , Stacking interactions are often dependent on sequence context, which may result in sequence-dependent stabilization of T-to-s 2 U substitutions. We tested the effects of a single T-to-s 2 U substitution at varied positions [positions 1, 3, and 5–7 (Figure f and Table )] of PNA P1 on PNA·RNA 2 triplex formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to T-to-U substitutions, T-to-s 2 U substitutions in PNAs may result in more significant strengthening of triplex formation, due to a reduced energy required for the dehydration, enhanced base stacking, in addition to a strengthened hydrogen bonding interaction. , Stacking interactions are often dependent on sequence context, which may result in sequence-dependent stabilization of T-to-s 2 U substitutions. We tested the effects of a single T-to-s 2 U substitution at varied positions [positions 1, 3, and 5–7 (Figure f and Table )] of PNA P1 on PNA·RNA 2 triplex formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of s 2 U residues into a PNA is expected to stabilize a PNA–RNA duplex and a PNA·RNA–RNA triplex through the formation of stabilized Watson–Crick s 2 U-A pairs and s 2 U·A-U triples, respectively (Figure e,f). However, incorporation of L residues into PNAs stabilizes the PNA·RNA–RNA triplex and destabilizes the PNA–RNA duplex, with the formation of stable L·G-C triples and unstable L-G Watson–Crick pairs (Figure c,d) . Thus, it is important to test if PNAs containing s 2 U and L residues (Figure c,e) still show the selective recognition of dsRNAs over ssRNAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Substitution C8 in guanosine [13, 15, 29, 30] molecular in Y motif can increase the stability of the triplex structure in addition to the stability that produces from the presence of Ag(I) ions and the influence of Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding in this structure. Most triplexes structures that concern RNA are synthesised regarding functionally RNAs such as ribosomal RNAs [31], telomerase RNAs [32], and long noncoding RNAs [33, 34]. In addition, these materials played a great role in molecular biology [35] and nanotechnology applications [36, 37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We designed an RNA hairpin construct called ”Short-Tetraloop Duplex” (ST-DPX), consisting of a UUCG tetraloop and a duplex stem with 17 base pairs: 23, 68, 69 5’- GGG CUA GAG AGA GAA AGU UUC GAC UUU CUC UCU CUA GCC C. The duplex stem further contains a 12-base-paired TFO12 binding domain, designed to form 12 consecutively stacked base triples, followed by 4 GC base pairs at the closing (blunt) end. The 12-base-paired TFO binding domain is an asymmetric sequence to ensure a specific binding direction of the partner TFO12; reverse binding of TFO12 would disrupt the consecutive formation of base triples and therefore reduce the stability of the RNA triplex construct.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%