2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0026472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified product of automata as a better tool for description of real-life systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definition 11. [21] Let A 1 = (I, S, δ), A 2 = (I, R, τ), and B = (J, T, σ) be quasi-automata. By the homogeneous product A 1 × A 2 , we mean the quasi-automaton (I, S × R, δ × τ), where δ × τ :…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition 11. [21] Let A 1 = (I, S, δ), A 2 = (I, R, τ), and B = (J, T, σ) be quasi-automata. By the homogeneous product A 1 × A 2 , we mean the quasi-automaton (I, S × R, δ × τ), where δ × τ :…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When modelling the process of data aggregation from underwater wireless sensor networks, Křehlík and Novák [21] suggested that using an internal link between respective automata in their cartesian composition describes the real-life context better because the internal link influences not only the given individual automaton but to a certain extent the whole system. In this paper we make use of [21]. Therefore, we include the following definition.…”
Section: Definition 4 ([13]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we include the following definition. For an example explaining the concept (together with calculations) see [21], Example 1. Definition 5 ([21]).…”
Section: Definition 4 ([13]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations