2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-015-2738-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified pedicle subtraction osteotomies (mPSO) for thoracolumbar post-tubercular kyphosis in pediatric patients: retrospective clinical cases and review of the literature

Abstract: Modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy (mPSO) is effective and reliable for thoracolumbar post-tubercular kyphosis in pediatric patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because typically multiple adjacent vertebral bodies have been destroyed and fused together, the SPO is not very suitable for rigid and severe tuberculous kyphosis. Because a PSO obtains 2.5° of correction per mm of posterior closure and thus excessive shortening of the spine cord may increase the risk of neurologic injury, it has been suggested that PSO should only be used to treat kyphosis < 40° [12,13,21,22]. PVCR was descried by Suk et al [11], and is reserved for more severe cases of kyphosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because typically multiple adjacent vertebral bodies have been destroyed and fused together, the SPO is not very suitable for rigid and severe tuberculous kyphosis. Because a PSO obtains 2.5° of correction per mm of posterior closure and thus excessive shortening of the spine cord may increase the risk of neurologic injury, it has been suggested that PSO should only be used to treat kyphosis < 40° [12,13,21,22]. PVCR was descried by Suk et al [11], and is reserved for more severe cases of kyphosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al [ 9 ] compared SPO and PSO in the treatment of rigid thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity, finding that PSO's kyphosis correction ranged from 31.7° to 48° with an average of 36.7°, while SPO's was 8.74° less. Furthermore, the incidence of biomechanical complications, including instrument breakage, anterior cortex fracture, pedicle screw loosening, pedicle fraction, vertebral body translation, and nonunion, in PSO was lower than in SPO [ 10 , 25 ]. In addition, a retrospective study of patients with rigid post-tuberculous kyphosis and no neurological deficit preoperatively, whose mean kyphotic angle was 58.8°, revealed the mean kyphosis correction of only 44.2° after PSO [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the technique should be limited to 30°-40° as a safe range of single segment osteotomy; otherwise, the spinal cord is excessively shortened and distorted [14] . Some modi cations of PSO are reported that could obtain a greater correction angle without postoperative complications [15] and Wu SS et al [16] claimed that they obtain a maximum correction angle of 60° at a single level. However, it is not suitable to correct a severe kyphotic deformity with a kyphotic angle beyond 90°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%