2012
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2011.2179517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Lyzenga's Method for Estimating Generalized Coefficients of Satellite-Based Predictor of Shallow Water Depth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of a multispectral image, there are simple and applicable SDB methods such as linear regression of reflectance logarithm (Lyzenga, Malinas, & Tanis, 2006;Lyzenga, 1978;Paredes & Spero, 1983), the linear ratio (Stumpf, Holderied, & Sinclair, 2003), and Depth of Penetration Zone (Jupp, 1988). At the current state, the linear regression is the most common and widely used SDB (Flener et al, 2012;Kanno & Tanaka, 2012;Liceaga-Correa & Euan-Avila, 2002;Yuzugullu & Aksoy, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a multispectral image, there are simple and applicable SDB methods such as linear regression of reflectance logarithm (Lyzenga, Malinas, & Tanis, 2006;Lyzenga, 1978;Paredes & Spero, 1983), the linear ratio (Stumpf, Holderied, & Sinclair, 2003), and Depth of Penetration Zone (Jupp, 1988). At the current state, the linear regression is the most common and widely used SDB (Flener et al, 2012;Kanno & Tanaka, 2012;Liceaga-Correa & Euan-Avila, 2002;Yuzugullu & Aksoy, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of empirical models have been proposed, from linear functions [20], band ratios to log transformed regression models [21], and non-linear inverse models [22] with varying degrees of corrections applied (atmospheric, sun glint, seafloor). The evolution of empirical models has been largely linked to the chronology of satellite platforms: coarse spatial resolution using Landsat TM [13,23,24]; medium spatial resolution SPOT images in shallow waters [15,25] or RapidEye in lakes [26]; and high spatial resolution with the use of commercial satellites such as WorldView [27,28], QuickBird [29,30] and IKONOS [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although [32] have demonstrated an artificial neural network that is not influenced by bottom type or vegetation on the seabed. The Lyzenga method [20] is not restricted to imagery from a single satellite-imagery from Landsat TM [13,21,23,24], QuickBird [29,30], SPOT [15,25] and WorldView-2 [27,28] have all been employed. Nor is the source of the imagery limited to satellites-Flener [33] have performed a comparison between mobile laser scanners and UAV imagery for bathymetric surveys of rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main functionalities of the module are (1) delineating water region; (2) atmospheric and water corrections; (3) GWR. An atmospheric and water corrections algorithm was adopted from previous authors and improvements have been made in terms of band selection [9,12]. Geometrically and radiometrically corrected spectral bands of any optical multispectral remote sensing data can be used to estimate SDB from the suitable coastal region.…”
Section: Implementation Of Sdb Model As Grass Gis Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have proposed various algorithms for atmospheric and water corrections [6,8,10]. Among them, some authors [12] have suggested to perform atmospheric correction prior to the water corrections. Nonetheless, this study adopted a more refined way of retrieving bottom reflectance originally proposed by [9] by removing atmospheric, water surface, and water column components.…”
Section: Atmospheric and Water Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%