2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.22.477328
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified dN/dS for accounting transition and transversion frequency difference and non-sense substitution in genomes

Abstract: The dN/dS value is estimated in homologous protein coding gene sequences between two closely related organisms for studying selection on the genes. In the usual method of calculation of synonymous (S) and non-synonymous (NS) sites in codons, the transition and transversion rates are considered same as well as no difference of pretermination codons from the other codons regarding NS substitutions is considered. In this study we are proposing a modification in the method by estimating the S and the NS sites in c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examining codon usage bias allows us to discern the distinct roles played by these forces in shaping the genetic architecture of the species [ 17 , 18 ]. Moreover, by scrutinizing the dN/dS substitution rates among paralogous genes within M. lotungensis , we can shed light on the evolutionary trajectory of gene families, gaining insights into the molecular mechanisms that underpin the species’ adaptations and vulnerabilities [ 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining codon usage bias allows us to discern the distinct roles played by these forces in shaping the genetic architecture of the species [ 17 , 18 ]. Moreover, by scrutinizing the dN/dS substitution rates among paralogous genes within M. lotungensis , we can shed light on the evolutionary trajectory of gene families, gaining insights into the molecular mechanisms that underpin the species’ adaptations and vulnerabilities [ 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%