2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified constitutive relation error identification strategy for transient dynamics with corrupted data: The elastic case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A first reason is related to the measurement uncertainties and biases that are usually higher than those typically encountered in 2D analyses [23,24]. Second, the computational environment needed to solve these inverse problems is generally very intrusive (e.g., constitutive equation gap method [25][26][27], virtual fields method for nonlinear constitutive laws [28], equilibrium gap method [29]). Third, nonlinear constitutive equations require spatiotemporal (i.e., 4D) analyses to be considered, which are both experimentally and computationally very demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first reason is related to the measurement uncertainties and biases that are usually higher than those typically encountered in 2D analyses [23,24]. Second, the computational environment needed to solve these inverse problems is generally very intrusive (e.g., constitutive equation gap method [25][26][27], virtual fields method for nonlinear constitutive laws [28], equilibrium gap method [29]). Third, nonlinear constitutive equations require spatiotemporal (i.e., 4D) analyses to be considered, which are both experimentally and computationally very demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach consists of applying level set methods to describe the shape of the sought cavity [4]. Instead of looking for the cavity's shape, it is also possible to try to directly identify Young's modulus spatial field within the studied domain, as it is applied in specific examples in [5,6] using a specific constitutive relation error in addition to the initial misfit function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improvement could be achieved through the interpolation from separate coarse DIC solutions to fine boundary distributions for I-DIC. Another solution would be the introduction of the boundary conditions to the set of unknowns [65,66] in I-DIC approaches. In that case DIC analyses would not be required.…”
Section: Hardening Responsementioning
confidence: 99%