2001
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.115035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Band retention is mechanically influenced by the manner in which bands are adapted on teeth, and by the properties of the cements used. [2][3][4] Today, the cements most widely used to cement molar bands are conventional glass ionomers (CGI), which have significant advantages, such as constant fluoride release and uptake, microbial inhibition, chemical adhesion to teeth and to metal, [5][6][7][8][9][10] low thermal coefficient of expansion 6 and low solubility. 11 The introduction of light polymerized systems enhanced initial CGI resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 Band retention is mechanically influenced by the manner in which bands are adapted on teeth, and by the properties of the cements used. [2][3][4] Today, the cements most widely used to cement molar bands are conventional glass ionomers (CGI), which have significant advantages, such as constant fluoride release and uptake, microbial inhibition, chemical adhesion to teeth and to metal, [5][6][7][8][9][10] low thermal coefficient of expansion 6 and low solubility. 11 The introduction of light polymerized systems enhanced initial CGI resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Modified resins such as BL have very little acidbase reaction and are less likely to ionically bond to enamel, compared to CGI. Gillgrass et al 10 found no clinical failure differences between BL and KC; however, BL failed mainly at enamel/cement interfaces, and KC failed mainly at cement/band interfaces. Gillgrass et al 10 did not find any differences in white spot lesions between BL and KC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations