“…The results indicate that the IMD-EACBR model achieved the greatest PDR under all SNs. For example, with 100 SNs, the IMD-EACBR model reached a PDR of 98.83%, whereas the SFO, GWO, GA, ALO, and PSO systems obtained lower PDRs of 98.40%, 96.47%, 95.65%, 94.37%, and 93.79%, respectively [20,[23][24][25][26][27]. Moreover, with 500 SNs, the IMD-EACBR model reached an ultimate PDR of 96.56%, whereas the SFO, GWO, GA, ALO, and PSO methodologies resulted in reduced PDRs of 95.20%, 94.66%, 93.47%, 92.30%, and 91.37%, respectively.…”