2005
DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gei045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified bacterial mutation test procedures for evaluation of peptides and amino acid-containing material

Abstract: Biological materials can release amino acids during the course of bacterial mutation testing. Low levels of released amino acids from soluble materials can cause moderate increases in the number of revertant colonies on the plate, whereas higher levels lead to overgrowth of the background lawn, making counting of revertant colonies impossible. For poorly soluble material, the released amino acids can be present at high levels in localized spots on the plate, leading to the growth of 'pseudorevertant' colonies.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treat-and-wash assay was conducted according to the method described by Thompson et al [39]. The protocol applied was as per the standard plate incorporation assay with the exception that the S9 mix, bacteria and sample extract were incubated for 90 min prior to the addition of molten top agar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The treat-and-wash assay was conducted according to the method described by Thompson et al [39]. The protocol applied was as per the standard plate incorporation assay with the exception that the S9 mix, bacteria and sample extract were incubated for 90 min prior to the addition of molten top agar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylcellulose overlay assay was performed as previously described [39]. Briefly, a 500 µL aliquot of S9 mix/phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 7.4) was combined with 100 µL of late-log bacterial culture in a sterile 15 mL tube.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutagenicity assay. The Ames test of BPH was conducted by the standard plate incorporation method (Maron & Ames, 1983) with minor modification (Thompson et al, 2005). The ability of the test subject to cause mutation in S. Typhimurium TA98 was evaluated in the presence/absence of the S9 metabolic activation system mix.…”
Section: Superoxide Dismutase (Sod) Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid false positive responses and overgrowth of background bacterial lawn, the genotoxicity potential of BPH was conducted with modified treatment and washing steps (Thompson et al, 2005) as well as a bacterial reverse mutation test (Ames test; using S. Typhimurium TA98 as a testing strain). Table 1 shows that BPH did not have toxicity to S. Typhimurium TA98, whereof there was no significant difference in the numbers of colonies between the control and test material.…”
Section: Bacterial Reverses Mutation Assays For Bphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The washed bacterial pellet is collected by centrifugation at 2000 g for 30 min. Supernatant is discarded and the bacterial pellet is resuspended in the residual supernatant ( ∼ 0.7 mL of the supernatant) prior to plating [28] .…”
Section: Experimental Procedure/design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%