2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Alexnet architecture for classification of diabetic retinopathy images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies have also used Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN), Bayesian Classification and Support Vector Machines (SVM) for the classification NPDR and PDR types of diabetic retinopathy. The images of haemorrhages [24] of blood vessels and analysed using image processing techniques and the extracted features when fed into the classifiers help to classify the types of DR diseases [25][26][27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have also used Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN), Bayesian Classification and Support Vector Machines (SVM) for the classification NPDR and PDR types of diabetic retinopathy. The images of haemorrhages [24] of blood vessels and analysed using image processing techniques and the extracted features when fed into the classifiers help to classify the types of DR diseases [25][26][27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 6 and Figs. 4, 5 and 6 provides a brief comparative study of the DNN-MSO with the existing models such as M-AlexNet [25], AlexNet, VggNet-s, VggNet-16, VggNet-19, GoogleNet and ResNet takes place on the applied same set of DR images. Figure 4 shows the sensitivity analysis of diverse models on the applied dataset.…”
Section: Dataset Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And then, the feature vectors of full connection layers with the ReLU in the two-stream network are spliced on the concatenate layer which connects the output of the two feature extraction network, and the fused feature is input to one full connection layers of 1024 nodes coming after the concatenate layer, and the output is fed into a SVM classifier used to map features to a probability distribution of defect classes for the final decision. The final defect type prediction gives 10 classes [30,31].…”
Section: Figure 3 the Two-stream Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%