2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2013.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified active disturbance rejection control for time-delay systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To perform the control test as done in [24], a unity step change is added to the set-point at 0 t = (s), and then a load disturbance with a magnitude of 0.1 is added to the plant input at 80 t = (s). For fair comparison in terms of the similar rising speed of the set-point response and the similar disturbance response peak, the observer and controller settings in the proposed method are listed in Table II for different cases, where the pre-filter ( ) F z is designed by using the formula in (22) with 0 h = , and the FSP filter is designed by using the formula in (24) [4] is performed, where the corresponding discrete-time controllers for implementation with the same sampling period are listed in Table III according to the control design formulae given therein.…”
Section: Robust Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To perform the control test as done in [24], a unity step change is added to the set-point at 0 t = (s), and then a load disturbance with a magnitude of 0.1 is added to the plant input at 80 t = (s). For fair comparison in terms of the similar rising speed of the set-point response and the similar disturbance response peak, the observer and controller settings in the proposed method are listed in Table II for different cases, where the pre-filter ( ) F z is designed by using the formula in (22) with 0 h = , and the FSP filter is designed by using the formula in (24) [4] is performed, where the corresponding discrete-time controllers for implementation with the same sampling period are listed in Table III according to the control design formulae given therein.…”
Section: Robust Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To counteract load disturbance and plant uncertainties, the active DRC (ADRC) strategy was developed which could lead to obvious performance improvement when compared to traditional controllers like PID [21], and therefore, has attracted increasing attention in the recent years [22][23][24][25]. The key idea of ADRC lies with treating external disturbance and unmodeled system dynamics as "a generalized disturbance", which is estimated by using a modified state observer, such that the feedback control could be specifically designed to eliminate the disturbance effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that the above parameters are selected based on following considerations: 29 1) The controller bandwidth should be higher than the bandwidth of closed feedback system that we desired;…”
Section: Active Disturbance Rejection Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few modified SP control methods have been recently developed to improve control performance for integrating and unstable processes [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] . In the recent papers 35,36 , a generalized predictor (GP) structure was developed to control stable, integrating or unstable processes with long time delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%