Modifications to residential neighbourhood characteristics and risk of 79 common health conditions: a prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background Observational studies have identified a link between unfavourable neighbourhood characteristics and increased risk of morbidity, but it is unclear whether changes in neighbourhoods affect future disease risk. We used a data-driven approach to assess the impact of neighbourhood modification on 79 health outcomes. MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, we used pooled, individual-level data from two Finnish cohort studies: the Health and Social Support study and the Finnish Public Sector study. Neighbourhood characteristics (mean educational level, median income, and employment rate of residents, and neighbourhood green space) and individual lifestyle factors of community-dwelling individuals were assessed at baseline (at different waves starting between 1998 and 2013). We repeated assessment of neighbourhood characteristics and lifestyle factors approximately 5 years from each baseline assessment, after which follow-up began for health conditions diagnosed according to the WHO International Classification of Diseases for 79 common health conditions using linkage to electronic health records. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to compute adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of incident disease associated with neighbourhood characteristics and changes in neighbourhood characteristics over time and logistic regression analysis to compute adjusted odds of association between changes in neighbourhood characteristics and individual lifestyle factors. Findings 114 786 individuals (87 012 [75•8%] women; mean age 44•4 years [SD 11•1]) had complete data and were included in this cohort study. During 1•17 million person-years at risk, we recorded 164 368 new-onset health conditions and 3438 deaths. Favourable changes in neighbourhood characteristics were associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality and incidence of 19 specific health conditions. Unfavourable changes were correspondingly associated with increased risk of mortality and 27 specific health conditions. Among participants who did not move residence during the observation period, relative to individuals who continually lived in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, those who experienced favourable modifications in neighbourhood characteristics had a lower risk of future diabetes (HR 0•84, 95% CI 0•75-0•93), stroke (0•49, 0•29-0•83), skin disease (0•72, 0•53-0•97), and osteoarthritis (0•87, 0•77-0•99). Living in a neighbourhood with improving characteristics was also associated with improvements in individual-level health-related lifestyle factors. Among participants who lived in advantaged residential environments at baseline, unfavourable changes in neighbourhood characteristics were associated with an increased risk of diabetes, stroke, skin disease, and osteoarthritis compared with individuals who lived in advantaged neighbourhoods throughout the study period.Interpretation Favourable modifications to residential neighbourhoods showed robust, longitudinal associations with a range of improvements in health outcomes, including improved health be...

Environmental risk factors of type 2 diabetes—an exposome approach

“…2) [25,61,62]. In line with these studies, and suggesting causal relationship, natural experiments and studies of residential relocation show that moving to low deprivation neighbourhoods reduces HbA 1c and risk of type 2 diabetes [42,63,64]. Despite growing evidence for the relationship between social capital and health [65], the few studies investigating social capital and type 2 diabetes incidence present mixed findings [61,[65][66][67][68].…”

“…A systematic review showed that interventions to increase physical activity by changes in the built environment generally improved levels of physical activity [41], but effects on type 2 diabetes have not been evaluated. Furthermore, a large Finnish cohort study of over 100,000 individuals showed that changes in residential greenness were associated with a 12% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes [42]. Finally, a meta-analysis showed an established association that urban dwellers, particularly in low-and middle-income countries, have a 40% increased risk of type 2 diabetes [26], but the underlying drivers of this association are not entirely clear.…”

Body-mass index and risk of obesity-related complex multimorbidity: an observational multicohort study

“…Of the 178 375 adults in the eligible population from the two Finnish cohorts, 117 583 (65•9%) participated in the baseline survey, 116 503 (65•3%) had data on height and weight, and 114 657 (64•3%) were successfully linked to national health registers and were included in the sample for primary analysis (figure 1). In the primary analysis population, the mean age at BMI assessment (baseline) was 42•6 years (SD 11•0), 86 632 (75•6%) were women and 28 025 (24 [18][19][20]. By contrast, obesity was associated with 28 of the 78 diseases studied (figure 2).…”

“…We excluded hospitalisations due to obesity and focused on a predefined list of 78 common ICD-10 disease chapters and diagnostic groups constructed for outcome-wide studies by investigators who were masked to exposure data (including BMI). 20 …”

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Childhood Body Mass Index Trajectories From Birth to 7 Years of Age

“…The neighborhood disadvantage score is based on the proportion of adults with low education, the unemployment rate, and the average annual income of households in each 250 m × 250 m grid area. 21,22 We replaced missing data (i.e., areas with fewer than 10 residents in the neighborhood) with the mean neighborhood disadvantage score of the eight adjacent map squares. For each of the three variables, we derived a standardized z score based on the total Finnish population (mean = 0, SD = 1).…”