2004
DOI: 10.1002/bin.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifications to basic functional analysis procedures in school settings: a selective review

Abstract: This review describes applied behavioral research involving functional analyses conducted in public school settings. Functional analyses in public school settings often require added conditions. The modified conditions described herein include changes to experimental designs, antecedent changes that include task variation, tasks included, idiosyncratic variables, physiological conditions, and modified escape conditions. Finally, consequent modifications cover peer attention, tangibles, varied attention, and al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, conducting a typical functional analysis can be complex and time consuming (Bloom, Iwata, Fritz, Roscoe, & Carreau, 2011) and therefore, is not attempted by most teachers. Nonetheless, the standard method of functional assessment can be modified to increase generalizability outside of the analysis setting and generate a successful intervention (Bloom, et al, 2011;Ellis & Magee, 2004). Moreover, the reduction in problem behavior and increased instructional time that result from function-based behavior intervention strategies make the effort worthwhile however demanding (Koegel et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conducting a typical functional analysis can be complex and time consuming (Bloom, Iwata, Fritz, Roscoe, & Carreau, 2011) and therefore, is not attempted by most teachers. Nonetheless, the standard method of functional assessment can be modified to increase generalizability outside of the analysis setting and generate a successful intervention (Bloom, et al, 2011;Ellis & Magee, 2004). Moreover, the reduction in problem behavior and increased instructional time that result from function-based behavior intervention strategies make the effort worthwhile however demanding (Koegel et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across methods, relatively low rates of problem behavior during FA have been demonstrated with those identified with EBD (Cunningham & O’Neill, 2007; Ervin et al, 2001; Solnick & Ardoin, 2010); this suggests that the relevant environmental variables have not been appropriately manipulated (Call, Wacker, Ringdahl, & Boelter, 2005; Cunningham & O’Neill, 2007; Ellis & Magee, 1999, 2004; Hanley, Iwata, & McCord, 2003). Concerns with completing FA in public school classrooms include competing interests of teachers, limited space and personnel, difficulty with procedural integrity, a decrease of instructional time, removal from and disruption to the learning environment, and risk to staff members and peers (Cunningham & O’Neill, 2007; Payne et al, 2007; Solnick & Ardoin, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence that interventions based on behavioral modification can be successful (Ellis & Magee, 1994), but literature is limited as many studies are directed towards behaviors being maintained by socially mediated reinforcers, for example, tangible reinforcement, escape from instructions, or social attention. Approximately 5 % of the studies were inconclu-'Address corres ondence to Dr. Jose I. Navarro, Department of Psychology, University of Cadiz, Campus &o San Pedro, Puerto Real-Cadiz, Spain 11510 or e-mail (jose.navarro@uca.es).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence that interventions based on behavioral modification can be successful (Ellis & Magee, 1994), but literature is limited as many studies are directed towards behaviors being maintained by socially mediated reinforcers, for example, tangible reinforcement, escape from instructions, or social attention. Approximately 5 % of the studies were inconclu-sive, and a quarter did not consider the importance of social reinforcers (Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richmari, 1994;Hanley, Iwata, & McCord, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%