2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5126415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifications produced on a large magnetized plasma column by a floating end-plate that is partially emissive: Experiment and theory

Abstract: An experiment is performed on a large plasma device operated by the Basic Plasma Science Facility at the University of California, Los Angeles, in which an electrically floating structure is placed near the end of the 18-m magnetized plasma column. The structure consists of a flat carbon plate that acts as a mask for a smaller, ring-shaped LaB6 emissive surface whose temperature can be externally controlled. This configuration has been previously used to study electron heat transport and pressure-driven avalan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…obtained from the combination of Ohm's law for a static background neutral j = σE and charged conservation ∇ • j = 0 allowed for analytical solutions when imposing Dirichlet conditions [36], the use of more physical flux conditions requires numerical modeling. Equation ( 16) is thus solved here using finite differences in the interior of the domain shown in figure 7 and implementing flux conditions at the electrodes in a way very similar to that employed by Von Compernolle et al [46]. Specifically, noting z 0 = −L/2 the axial position of the left boundary of the domain, the ion-sheath in front of the electrode is modeled via the non-linear Neumann condition…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obtained from the combination of Ohm's law for a static background neutral j = σE and charged conservation ∇ • j = 0 allowed for analytical solutions when imposing Dirichlet conditions [36], the use of more physical flux conditions requires numerical modeling. Equation ( 16) is thus solved here using finite differences in the interior of the domain shown in figure 7 and implementing flux conditions at the electrodes in a way very similar to that employed by Von Compernolle et al [46]. Specifically, noting z 0 = −L/2 the axial position of the left boundary of the domain, the ion-sheath in front of the electrode is modeled via the non-linear Neumann condition…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. ( 16) is thus solved here using finite differences in the interior of the domain shown in figure 7 and implementing flux conditions at the electrodes in a way very similar to that employed by Von Compernolle et al [43]. Specifically, noting z 0 = −L/2 the axial position of the left boundary of the domain, the ion-sheath in front of the electrode is modeled via the non-linear Neumann condition ∂ψ(r, z) ∂z…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%